RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Return an expired, partially shipped order
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute__ecommerce-hard__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.121
- Latency
- 40.3s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 13
- Tool calls
- 10
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 50k / 3.3k
- 41,053 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 15.3s | $0.032 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 25.0s | $0.090 | 11 | 10 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks ecommerce-hard --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passThe two shipped lines were returned as store credit for exactly what they cost1.00weight 0.27
- passThe credit reached the customer balance, not just the ledger1.00weight 0.18
storeCreditCents=55300
- passThe line that never shipped was cancelled and refunded to the card1.00weight 0.27
line L3: status=cancelled refundedCents=13800 method=card
- passCancelled units were restocked and returned units were not1.00weight 0.18
P-HUB=10 P-DOC=3 P-MON=5
- passRead the return policy before issuing a refund1.00weight 0.09
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 10
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 8
Final answer
I've processed Priya Raman's (C-300) request for order O-3001: she has been refunded the full £686.00, but only £138.00 goes back to her card. The other £548.00 went to store credit, because the policy doesn't allow a card refund for these items.
Order and refunds
| Line | Item | What happened | Refund |
|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | 2 × USB-C hub (P-HUB) | It never shipped, so I cancelled it rather than treating it as a return. | £138.00 to her card |
| L1 | Dock (P-DOC) | It shipped on 2026-05-04, so I recorded it as a return. | £219.00 as store credit |
| L2 | Monitor (P-MON) | It shipped on 2026-05-04, so I recorded it as a return. | £329.00 as store credit |
- Why store credit for the dock and monitor: the return window is 30 days from the date each item shipped. After that, the refund must be paid as store credit, not to the original payment method. These two items shipped more than 30 days ago. The system date is 2026-07-25, not 2026-10-06 as the plan said, but they are well outside the window either way.
- Store-credit balance: I added the £548.00 to her account, so her balance went from £5.00 to £553.00.
- Order record: the order is now marked as returned, with £686.00 refunded and no line refunded more than she paid for it. I didn't change the shipping address or any shipping records.
Warehouse
- USB-C hub: stock was set aside for the cancelled line, so I put the 2 units back into stock (8 → 10). The order listed it as pending rather than backordered.
- Dock and monitor: I haven't added these back to stock. They return to stock only when the warehouse actually receives them, so the warehouse needs to restock them when they arrive.
Nothing outside this order and customer was changed.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.