RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Plan-execute on Triage a new service desk ticket
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute__support-easy__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.089
- Latency
- 27.3s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 12
- Tool calls
- 9
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 48k / 1.9k
- 40,270 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 10.8s | $0.029 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 16.5s | $0.060 | 10 | 9 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks support-easy --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSeverity matches the escalation matrix for the service and impact scope1.00weight 0.27
severity=sev3 (matrix says sev3)
- passSLA deadline is the triage time plus the response target for that severity1.00weight 0.27
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T17:20:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z)
- passAssigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at the deadline1.00weight 0.27
assignee=E-301 (expected E-301)
- passTicket left in status open1.00weight 0.09
- passEscalation matrix read before the severity was set1.00weight 0.09
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 9
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 8
Final answer
T-1041 is triaged. It's now sev3, due 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z, and assigned to Yuki Sato (E-301), and its status changed from new to open. I re-read the ticket afterwards and all three values are set correctly.
- Severity: sev3. The escalation matrix rates a team-level VPN outage as sev3. The ticket is about the VPN and affects the Berlin sales team, about nine people. The requester's seniority played no part in this.
- Deadline: 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z. The ticket had no deadline, so I set one. The service desk clock read 2026-03-17T09:20:00Z when I triaged it, and sev3 has a response target of 480 minutes, which gives 17:20.
- Assignee: Yuki Sato (E-301). The VPN belongs to the network-primary rotation. Yuki is on call for that rotation at the deadline, in the shift running 08:00–20:00Z, so 17:20 falls well inside it. Their profile confirms they're on network-primary.
T-1041 has no linked tickets, and I didn't change any other ticket.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.