RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute__support-monday-triage__r2
Score
0.951
- Cost
- $0.537
- Latency
- 2m 4s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 79
- Tool calls
- 76
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 320k / 14k
- 291,843 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 23.0s | $0.059 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 41s | $0.478 | 77 | 76 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2015 graded sev11.00weight 0.02
severity=sev1
- passT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T09:10:00Z
- passT-2015 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2016 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2016 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- failT-1999 merged into T-20030.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 76
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 15
Final answer
I triaged all 16 tickets in the new queue, and it's now empty. That's the 14 that were there at the start plus T-2015 and T-2016, which arrived while I was working. One correction to the plan: the desk clock reads Monday 2026-03-23 08:10 UTC, not 2026-10-13. The desk opens at 09:00, so business-hours deadlines start counting then. Wednesday 25 March is a company holiday and is skipped.
Closed as not service requests
- T-2010: marketing email (a SyncFlow promotion).
- T-2014: automatic out-of-office reply.
Duplicates merged (no deadlines had been set on either group, so each survivor got triage time plus its target)
- T-2005 into T-2004: both are the CRM search failure (knowledge base article KB-23 says all failing-search reports are one problem). T-2004 is sev2 at department scope, due 12:10Z, assigned to E-201.
- T-2012 into T-2003: both are Payments builds failing since Saturday. T-2003 is sev2 at department scope, due 12:10Z, assigned to E-101.
Other tickets (the assignee is whoever is on call for the owning rotation when the deadline falls)
| Ticket | Severity | Due (UTC) | Assignee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-2001 Berlin VPN keeps dropping (team) | sev3 | 23 Mar 17:00 | E-303 (cover, see below) |
| T-2013 Lisbon can't reach VPN (department) | sev2 | 23 Mar 12:10 | E-303 (cover, see below) |
| T-2008 VPN client update fails | sev4 | 26 Mar 17:00 | E-302 |
| T-2016 VPN token app asks to re-register | sev4 | 26 Mar 17:00 | E-302 |
| T-2007 Phishing: password typed into a fake page | sev2 (security) | 23 Mar 12:10 | E-601 (security on-call) |
| T-2011 Warehouse overtime not imported (team) | sev2 | 23 Mar 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2006 Wrong tax code on payslip (single user) | sev2 | 23 Mar 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2015 Finance payslips missing (department) | sev1 | 23 Mar 09:10 | E-201 |
| T-2002 Saved CRM filter disappeared | sev4 | 26 Mar 17:00 | E-203 (cover, see below) |
| T-2009 Build logs page is slow | sev4 | 26 Mar 17:00 | E-102 |
Rule-driven decisions
- T-2006 is sev2, not sev3: knowledge base article KB-55 changes payroll single-user tickets to sev2 during the March payroll close (20–31 March).
- T-2007 is a security incident: it came in on the VPN service, but it's a phishing report with exposed credentials, so it's sev2 and owned by security on-call.
- Leave cover: E-301 is on leave today, so network-secondary's on-call E-303 covers T-2001 and T-2013. E-202 is on leave on 26 March, so business-apps-secondary's on-call E-203 covers T-2002. I left a comment on each of these tickets explaining why.
- T-2001 and T-2013 stay separate: they're different offices with different symptoms (connections dropping versus no connection at all).
- No major incident: nothing had company-wide impact, so I didn't run the runbook or page anyone.
Where I didn't follow the plan: I assigned tickets but did not escalate them. The plan says to escalate whenever the matrix names an escalation rotation. But escalating makes that engineer the assignee, and the handbook says a ticket must never go to someone outside the rotation that owns its service. Escalating every sev2 to platform-primary, or T-2015 to incident-command, would break that rule.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.