RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Propose-select on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-opus-5-5__propose-select__airline-irrops-reprotect__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $1.79
- Latency
- 3m 53s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 219
- Tool calls
- 213
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 700k / 44k
- 588,836 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 1m 24s | $0.374 | 51 | 50 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 1m 15s | $0.340 | 43 | 42 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 1m 23s | $0.356 | 44 | 43 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Select | 34.2s | $0.159 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 55s | $0.558 | 79 | 78 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 213
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 16
Final answer
All 13 passengers on AA918 have been moved to other flights at no charge. Ten vouchers are issued and each passenger has had one message with their new itinerary.
Before changing anything I re-checked what the plan relied on, and it all held:
- Flight: AA918 is cancelled and has 13 confirmed reservations.
- Bulletins: there are none, so the handbook rules apply as written.
- Ledger: it was empty.
- Passengers: tiers, booking dates, the travelling-together group (R6110 + R6111) and the two Boston connections (R6104, R6113 on AA1402) all match.
- Seats: every replacement flight is scheduled, and its seat counts were what the plan expected.
Rebookings, in priority order (tier, then earliest booking date):
| # | Reservation | Passenger | New itinerary | Cabin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R6103 | Chloe Park | UA88, 08-03, arrives 12:25 | Business |
| 2 | R6109 | Iris Vance | UA88, 08-03, arrives 12:25 | Premium economy, moved up from economy |
| 3 | R6110 + R6111 | Jun Takeda + Kofi Mensah | AA204, 08-03, arrives 15:15, together | Economy |
| 4 | R6102 | Ben Okafor | DL512, 08-03, arrives 18:40 | Economy |
| 5 | R6106 | Farid Haddad | UA88, 08-03, arrives 12:25 | Basic economy |
| 6 | R6112 | Lea Sorensen | AA204, 08-03, arrives 15:15 | Business, moved up from premium economy |
| 7 | R6104 | Dev Mehta | AA210 08-03, then AA1410 08-04, arrives Boston 12:25 (replaces AA1402) | Economy |
| 8 | R6113 | Mo Farah | Same as Dev Mehta | Economy |
| 9 | R6108 | Hugo Brandt | AA210, 08-03, arrives 23:50 | Economy |
| 10 | R6107 | Grace Liu | AA206, 08-04, arrives 15:15 | Economy |
| 11 | R6101 | Ana Ruiz | AA206, 08-04, arrives 15:15 | Economy |
| 12 | R6105 | Elena Fox | AA204, 08-03, arrives 15:15 | Basic economy |
Vouchers (each its own entry):
- Ben Okafor (R6102): 15000-cent compensation (V1), for arriving 5 hours late.
- Dev Mehta (R6104): 30000-cent compensation (V2) and 18000-cent hotel (V3).
- Mo Farah (R6113): 30000-cent compensation (V4) and 18000-cent hotel (V5).
- Hugo Brandt (R6108): 30000-cent compensation (V6), for arriving 10h10 late. He still arrives the same day, so no hotel voucher.
- Grace Liu (R6107): 24000-cent compensation (V7), cut from 30000 because a voucher can't exceed her 24000 fare, plus an 18000-cent hotel voucher (V8).
- Ana Ruiz (R6101): 30000-cent compensation (V9) and 18000-cent hotel (V10).
Everyone else arrives less than 3 hours late or earlier than planned, so they get nothing. Messages N1–N13 went out after the bookings were made. They explain the free cabin upgrades to Iris and Lea, why Ben, Hugo and Ana got the amounts they did, and why Grace's voucher is capped.
Nothing was cancelled, refunded or charged. No other booking or passenger record was touched, and the AA1402 flight itself is unchanged; only Dev's and Mo's seats on it were released. There were no customer requests to close.
One thing I didn't re-check myself: today's date shows as 2026-10-05, but the plan's investigation found the system date is 2026-08-02. That makes AA918 tomorrow, and I relied on that finding.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.