RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Propose-select on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-opus-5-5__propose-select__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $1.83
- Latency
- 3m 47s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 250
- Tool calls
- 243
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 682k / 45k
- 566,373 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 1m 26s | $0.370 | 54 | 53 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 1m 18s | $0.356 | 50 | 49 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 1m 29s | $0.410 | 67 | 66 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Select | 41.1s | $0.192 | 3 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 36s | $0.504 | 76 | 75 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 243
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 16
Final answer
All 13 passengers on AA918 have been rebooked at no cost, their compensation and hotel vouchers are issued, and each has had one message with their new itinerary and vouchers.
Before making any changes I re-checked the plan against live data: AA918 is cancelled with 13 confirmed reservations. The tiers, booking dates, fares and seat counts were all as the plan said. There are no bulletins and nothing was already on the ledger. Every rebooking reported "No money was moved": I charged no change fees or fare differences and refunded or cancelled nothing.
| Priority | Reservation | New itinerary | Owed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R6103 Chloe Park (platinum) | UA88, 06:15 → 12:25, business | Nothing (arrives early) |
| 2 | R6109 Iris Vance (platinum) | UA88, upgraded to premium economy | Nothing (arrives early) |
| 3 | R6110 Jun Takeda / R6111 Kofi Mensah (group G-7, ranked as gold) | AA204, 09:05 → 15:15, economy, together | Nothing (1h35 late) |
| 4 | R6102 Ben Okafor (gold) | DL512, 12:30 → 18:40, economy | $150 compensation (5h00 late) |
| 5 | R6106 Farid Haddad (gold) | UA88, basic economy | Nothing (arrives early) |
| 6 | R6112 Lea Sorensen (gold) | AA204, upgraded to business | Nothing (1h35 late) |
| 7 | R6104 Dev Mehta (silver) | AA210, 17:40 → 23:50, then AA1410 on 08-04, 09:00 → 12:25 BOS | $300 compensation + $180 hotel (17h30 late, next day) |
| 8 | R6113 Mo Farah (silver) | Same as Dev Mehta | $300 compensation + $180 hotel |
| 9 | R6108 Hugo Brandt (silver) | AA210, economy (last economy seat) | $300 compensation (10h10 late, same day) |
| 10 | R6107 Grace Liu (no tier) | AA206 on 08-04, 09:05 → 15:15, economy | $240 compensation + $180 hotel |
| 11 | R6101 Ana Ruiz (no tier) | AA206 on 08-04, economy | $300 compensation + $180 hotel |
| 12 | R6105 Elena Fox (no tier) | AA204, basic economy | Nothing (1h35 late) |
- Upgrades: Iris and Lea were each moved up one cabin. Both are platinum or gold, travelling alone on a single flight, and their own cabin was full on a flight that gets them there sooner. Nobody else was upgraded or moved down a cabin, and the G-7 pair were kept together.
- Boston connections: neither Dev nor Mo could reach their original AA1402 connection, so I rebooked that leg too. Their connection is overnight in Chicago, which the rules allow.
- Grace Liu's voucher: she would normally get $300, but compensation can't exceed the fare paid. Her fare was $240, so her voucher is $240 and her message explains why.
- Voucher totals: I issued 10 vouchers (V1–V10): $1,590 in compensation and four hotel vouchers of $180 each, $720 in all.
I didn't touch any other booking, passenger record or flight.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.