ScaffoldBench

RunOpus 5.5repeat 1

Propose-select on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports

claude-opus-5-5__propose-select__support-medium__r1

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.472
Latency
1m 9s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
58
Tool calls
52
Subagents
3
Tokens in / out
143k / 12k
106,007 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
  • The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.

Phases

Proposal 1 (policy-first): 0.0s to 23.5s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.086
Proposal 2 (state-first): 0.0s to 24.7s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.091
Proposal 3 (outcome-first): 0.0s to 22.2s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.087
Select: 24.7s to 44.8s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.080
Execute: 44.8s to 1m 9s, finished, 16 tool calls, $0.127

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Proposal 1 (policy-first)23.5s$0.0861312claude-opus-5-5
Proposal 2 (state-first)24.7s$0.0911312claude-opus-5-5
Proposal 3 (outcome-first)22.2s$0.0871312claude-opus-5-5
Select20.1s$0.08020claude-opus-5-5
Execute24.4s$0.1271716claude-opus-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks support-medium --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set
    1.00weight 0.23

    sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)

  • passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket
    1.00weight 0.23

    T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052

  • passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor
    1.00weight 0.15

    T-1061 links=[T-1052]

  • passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope
    1.00weight 0.15

    severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)

  • passSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline
    1.00weight 0.15

    assignee=E-201 (expected E-201)

  • passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge
    1.00weight 0.08

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
52
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
11

Final answer

The three reports of the CRM search outage are now one ticket, T-1052, graded sev2 and assigned to Ines Kovac (E-201). I re-checked every ticket, the CRM severity table, the on-call schedule and the knowledge base articles first, and they matched the plan.

What I changed

  1. Merged T-1053 and T-1054 into T-1052. All three report the same CRM account search error (HTTP 500). Knowledge base article KB-23 says every failing-search report is one incident, caused by a corrupt search index. T-1052 was created first (07:05Z), so it is the ticket that stays open.
  2. Deadline is now 2026-03-17T12:40Z. It was 15:05Z on T-1052. When tickets are merged, the remaining one must carry the earliest deadline promised on any of them, which was T-1053's 12:40Z. The handbook also says a promised deadline is never moved earlier, which seems to conflict. I followed the merge rule because 12:40Z had already been promised to T-1053's requester, and no requester's deadline got later.
  3. Severity is now sev2. The merge carried over T-1053's impact (the whole department), and the CRM table gives sev2 for that. The deadline did not change.
  4. Assigned to E-201 Ines Kovac. CRM belongs to the business-apps rotation, and she is on call there from 08:00 to 20:00Z, which covers the 12:40Z deadline. T-1053 had been assigned to Tomas Lindqvist (E-202), who is not on call then, so that assignment wasn't kept.
  5. The link moved over automatically. T-1052 and T-1061 now point at each other. I also added a comment to T-1052 recording the merge and the reasons.

What I left alone

  • T-1055 (CSV export gives an empty file): this is a different problem. The requester says search works fine for them, and KB-24 says export reports must be tracked separately.
  • T-1061 (engineering's ticket for the search index rebuild): it tracks the fix rather than reporting the outage, so I didn't merge it.
  • Nothing was closed. T-1052 can't be closed while T-1061 is still open.
  • Nothing was escalated, because you asked for grading and assignment only. If you want it escalated, sev2 goes to whoever is on call for the platform-primary rotation at 12:40Z.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.