RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Single on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-opus-5-5__single__airline-baggage-audit__r2
Score
0.772
- Cost
- $0.384
- Latency
- 1m 32s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 92
- Tool calls
- 91
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 244k / 9.2k
- 223,870 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldsingle.toolsThe agent was shown exactly the task’s tools, none missing and none extra.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | 1m 32s | $0.384 | 92 | 91 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies single --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 12000 of an expected 12000
- passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL8: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL13: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 2500 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5000 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- policy violationRefunded more than a charge was overcharged×0.8
Refunded beyond the overcharge: L5.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 91
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
I audited all 19 baggage fees posted from 2026-07-20 to 2026-07-26 and recorded an outcome on each one. Six were overcharged and are refunded, 11 were correct, and 2 were undercharged and left as they are.
How I judged them: Each fee was checked against the passenger's cabin and frequent-flyer tier on the day it was charged, not today. Bulletin PB-2026-13 changes the price for the first bag over the allowance from 4500 to 5000 cents from 2026-07-23. Fees charged before that date were judged at 4500 cents, and fees from that date on at 5000 cents. The baggage rules table still shows 4500 cents because it hasn't been updated yet. Each bag after that costs 7500 cents throughout.
Overcharged, refunded to the original payment method for exactly the extra amount:
| Entry | Reservation | Charged | Should have been | Refunded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | R8125 | 12000 | 0 (gold on 07-20, so 3 free bags in economy; the tier dropped on 07-21) | 12000 |
| L5 | R8116 | 12000 | 4500 (economy + silver, so 1 bag over) | 7500 |
| L7 | R8118 | 4500 | 0 (economy + silver, 2 bags) | 4500 |
| L10 | R8113 | 12000 | 4500 (basic economy + silver, so 1 bag over) | 7500 |
| L15 | R8119 | 7500 | 5000 (basic economy + gold, 1 bag over at the new price) | 2500 |
| L19 | R8114 | 5000 | duplicate of L18 for the same 3 bags | 5000 (in full) |
That is 39,000 cents refunded in total.
Undercharged, marked but not re-billed (the audit rules forbid re-billing):
- L4 (R8112): charged 9000; it should have been 12000.
- L20 (R8121): charged 4500 on 07-25; it should have been 5000 at the new price.
Correct: L2, L6, L8, L9, L11, L12, L13, L16, L17, L18 and L21.
- Cabin or tier changes: for L6, L8, L9 and L13 the passenger changed cabin or tier after the fee was charged. I judged each on what applied that day.
- Two fees on one reservation: L18 is the first fee for R8114's bags, and only L19 was the duplicate. L21 on R8122 isn't a duplicate, because it covers a third bag added later.
One thing to check: the payment lookup said "no payment instrument on file" for all six refunded reservations. That isn't the same as an inactive card, so I sent the refunds to the original payment method as the audit rules say. The system accepted all six (ledger entries L25–L30). Finance may want to make sure those refunds actually reach the customers. I didn't send messages to the passengers, because the audit rules don't call for it.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.