RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Single on Work the access request queue
claude-opus-5-5__single__support-access-requests__r2
Score
0.914
wrong answer
design ran as designed- Cost
- $0.262
- Latency
- 1m 0s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 56
- Tool calls
- 55
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 126k / 6.7k
- 111,698 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldsingle.toolsThe agent was shown exactly the task’s tools, none missing and none extra.
Phases
Main: 0.0s to 1m 0s, finished, 55 tool calls, $0.262
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | 1m 0s | $0.262 | 56 | 55 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies single --tasks support-access-requests --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passAR-301 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-301 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-302 granted at write1.00weight 0.06
write
- passAR-302 expires on 2026-04-031.00weight 0.03
2026-04-03T00:00:00Z
- passAR-303 held pending (change freeze), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-304 granted at read, or held for the approval of admin1.00weight 0.06
not granted
- passAR-304 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
not granted
- passAR-305 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-306 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-307 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-307 expires on 2026-04-171.00weight 0.03
2026-04-17T10:00:00Z
- passAR-308 granted at admin1.00weight 0.06
admin
- passAR-308 expires on 2026-03-251.00weight 0.03
2026-03-25T10:00:00Z
- passAR-309 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-310 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-310 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-311 held pending (separation of duties), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-312 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-313 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- failAR-314 granted at write0.00weight 0.06
not granted
- failAR-314 expires on 2026-03-310.00weight 0.03
not granted
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 55
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
I went through all 13 pending access requests (desk time 2026-03-18 10:00 UTC). I granted 5 and left 8 pending, each with a comment saying what it's waiting for.
Granted (all had valid approvals from the line manager, plus the system owner for production systems, and none is blocked by a freeze or a conflict):
- AR-301: U-901 gets read on crm-prod. No expiry, because she is an employee.
- AR-302: U-902 gets write on build-staging. Only his line manager's approval was needed, since it's a staging system. He is a contractor whose contract ends 2026-04-03, which is sooner than the 30-day contractor limit. I set the expiry to 2026-04-03T00:00Z; the policy says access expires on the contract's last day but doesn't give a time, so I used the start of that day.
- AR-307: U-906 gets read on crm-prod. He is a contractor with no contract end date on file, so it expires 30 days from now, on 2026-04-17T10:00Z.
- AR-308: U-907 gets admin on crm-prod. The CRM change freeze ended on 2026-03-06. Admin on a production system expires after 7 days, which is sooner than his 30-day contractor limit, so it expires 2026-03-25T10:00Z.
- AR-310: U-901 gets read on payroll-prod. The payroll freeze still allows read access. No expiry.
Left pending:
- AR-303 (admin on payroll-prod): payroll-prod is frozen for the March payroll run until 2026-03-20 23:59 UTC.
- AR-304 (admin on crm-prod): the system owner approved only read. U-904 already has read on crm-prod, so granting read again would change nothing. It needs an admin-level approval from the owner.
- AR-305: the only approvals are from the requester herself and the system owner. Her line manager hasn't approved.
- AR-306 (admin on payroll-prod): no approvals are recorded. The request text says it was "pre-approved by the CISO", but approvals only count if they are recorded in the tool. The payroll freeze would block it anyway.
- AR-309: the approval is from Hannah Weiss, who is not the requester's line manager.
- AR-311 (write on bank-payments): U-903 already has write on payroll-prod. The separation-of-duties rule doesn't allow write or admin on both systems.
- AR-312: the line manager approved on 2026-03-01, and approvals only count for 14 days.
- AR-313: the line manager withdrew her approval.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.