RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Gated-execute on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-sonnet-5-5__gated-execute__airline-baggage-audit__r1
Score
0.772
- Cost
- $1.25
- Latency
- 6m 4s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 399
- Tool calls
- 340
- Subagents
- 28
- Tokens in / out
- 1.3M / 40k
- 1,074,062 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 6m 4s | $0.216 | 95 | 94 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 1: refund_fee | 11.8s | $0.029 | 11 | 9 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 2: refund_fee | 14.3s | $0.043 | 14 | 12 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 3: refund_fee | 9.4s | $0.030 | 11 | 9 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 4: refund_fee | 8.6s | $0.029 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 5: refund_fee | 12.2s | $0.039 | 13 | 11 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 6: refund_fee | 16.9s | $0.039 | 13 | 11 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 7: refund_fee | 11.4s | $0.042 | 14 | 12 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 8: refund_fee | 12.5s | $0.041 | 11 | 9 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 9: charge_fee | 12.7s | $0.034 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 10: annotate_ledger_entry | 8.6s | $0.031 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 11: annotate_ledger_entry | 14.2s | $0.036 | 8 | 6 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 12: annotate_ledger_entry | 8.7s | $0.032 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 13: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.4s | $0.034 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 14: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.0s | $0.033 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 15: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.1s | $0.032 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 16: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.8s | $0.030 | 8 | 6 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 17: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.2s | $0.033 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 18: annotate_ledger_entry | 13.6s | $0.040 | 11 | 9 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 19: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.9s | $0.041 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 20: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.1s | $0.042 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 21: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.9s | $0.034 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 22: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.4s | $0.044 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 23: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.6s | $0.042 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 24: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.3s | $0.040 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 25: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.1s | $0.043 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 26: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.8s | $0.031 | 6 | 4 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 27: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.7s | $0.046 | 13 | 11 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 28: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.3s | $0.045 | 13 | 11 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 12000 of an expected 12000
- passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5500 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 0
- passL8: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL13: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 2500 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5000 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- policy violationRefunded more than a charge was overcharged×0.8
Refunded beyond the overcharge: L8.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 340
- failed tool calls
- 9
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
I audited all 19 baggage fees posted 2026-07-20 to 2026-07-26 and annotated each one. One refund I issued was wrong, and I couldn't reverse it.
Rules used:
- The baggage rules table gives the allowances.
- Bulletin PB-2026-13 raised the first chargeable bag from 4500 to 5000 cents from 07-23.
- Each fee is judged on the tier and cabin the reservation had on the posting date, taken from the tier and reservation histories.
Refunded overcharges (original payment method):
| Entry | Reservation | Refund | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | R8125 | 12000 | Passenger was gold on 07-20, so 3 bags were free. |
| L5 | R8116 | 5500 | Overcharged by 7500, and 2000 had already been refunded as a courtesy. |
| L7 | R8118 | 4500 | Silver in economy gets 2 free bags. |
| L10 | R8113 | 7500 | Silver in basic economy gets 1 free bag, so the fee should have been 4500. |
| L15 | R8119 | 2500 | The fee should have been 5000 under the new bulletin rate. |
| L19 | R8114 | 5000 | Duplicate of L18 for the same bags. |
Marked correct, no action: L2, L6, L9, L11, L12, L13, L16, L17, L18, L21.
Marked undercharged, not re-billed: L4 (R8112) and L20 (R8121).
Marked overcharged: L3, L5, L7, L10, L15 and L19, all refunded as above.
My mistake on L8 (R8120): I refunded 7500 on L8 based on the passenger's current premium economy cabin. She was in economy on 07-21 and upgraded on 07-22, so the original 12000 fee was correct. The reviewer blocked my attempt to re-charge it, because that would be a duplicate baggage fee and re-billing isn't allowed. I annotated L8 as correct and added no new fee. The 7500 refund (ledger entry L28) is still out and needs a supervisor or finance to handle it outside the audit tools.
The reviewer also stopped me from refunding L13 (R8123) for the same reason: that cabin change came the day after the fee was posted.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.