ScaffoldBench

RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1

Gated-execute on Audit a week of baggage fees

claude-sonnet-5-5__gated-execute__airline-baggage-audit__r1

Score

0.772

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$1.25
Latency
6m 4s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
399
Tool calls
340
Subagents
28
Tokens in / out
1.3M / 40k
1,074,062 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 6m 4s, finished, 94 tool calls, $0.216
Review 1: refund_fee: 34.6s to 46.4s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.029
Review 2: refund_fee: 46.4s to 1m 1s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.043
Review 3: refund_fee: 1m 1s to 1m 10s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.030
Review 4: refund_fee: 1m 10s to 1m 19s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.029
Review 5: refund_fee: 1m 19s to 1m 31s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.039
Review 6: refund_fee: 1m 31s to 1m 48s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.039
Review 7: refund_fee: 1m 48s to 1m 59s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.042
Review 8: refund_fee: 1m 59s to 2m 12s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.041
Review 9: charge_fee: 2m 24s to 2m 36s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.034
Review 10: annotate_ledger_entry: 2m 38s to 2m 47s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.031
Review 11: annotate_ledger_entry: 2m 47s to 3m 1s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.036
Review 12: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 1s to 3m 10s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.032
Review 13: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 10s to 3m 19s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.034
Review 14: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 19s to 3m 28s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.033
Review 15: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 28s to 3m 39s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.032
Review 16: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 39s to 3m 49s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.030
Review 17: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 49s to 3m 58s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.033
Review 18: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 58s to 4m 12s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.040
Review 19: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 12s to 4m 22s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.041
Review 20: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 22s to 4m 33s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.042
Review 21: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 33s to 4m 43s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.034
Review 22: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 43s to 4m 54s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.044
Review 23: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 54s to 5m 6s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.042
Review 24: annotate_ledger_entry: 5m 6s to 5m 15s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.040
Review 25: annotate_ledger_entry: 5m 15s to 5m 26s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.043
Review 26: annotate_ledger_entry: 5m 26s to 5m 36s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.031
Review 27: annotate_ledger_entry: 5m 36s to 5m 47s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.046
Review 28: annotate_ledger_entry: 5m 47s to 5m 57s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.045

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute6m 4s$0.2169594claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 1: refund_fee11.8s$0.029119claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 2: refund_fee14.3s$0.0431412claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 3: refund_fee9.4s$0.030119claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 4: refund_fee8.6s$0.029108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 5: refund_fee12.2s$0.0391311claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 6: refund_fee16.9s$0.0391311claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 7: refund_fee11.4s$0.0421412claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 8: refund_fee12.5s$0.041119claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 9: charge_fee12.7s$0.03497claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 10: annotate_ledger_entry8.6s$0.031108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 11: annotate_ledger_entry14.2s$0.03686claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 12: annotate_ledger_entry8.7s$0.032108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 13: annotate_ledger_entry9.4s$0.03497claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 14: annotate_ledger_entry9.0s$0.033108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 15: annotate_ledger_entry11.1s$0.03297claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 16: annotate_ledger_entry9.8s$0.03086claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 17: annotate_ledger_entry9.2s$0.033108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 18: annotate_ledger_entry13.6s$0.040119claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 19: annotate_ledger_entry9.9s$0.0411210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 20: annotate_ledger_entry11.1s$0.0421210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 21: annotate_ledger_entry9.9s$0.03497claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 22: annotate_ledger_entry11.4s$0.0441210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 23: annotate_ledger_entry11.6s$0.0421210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 24: annotate_ledger_entry9.3s$0.0401210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 25: annotate_ledger_entry11.1s$0.0431210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 26: annotate_ledger_entry9.8s$0.03164claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 27: annotate_ledger_entry10.7s$0.0461311claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 28: annotate_ledger_entry10.3s$0.0451311claude-sonnet-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 12000 of an expected 12000

  • passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 5500 of an expected 5500

  • passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 4500 of an expected 4500

  • passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • failL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    0.00weight 0.04

    refunded 7500 of an expected 0

  • passL8: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 7500 of an expected 7500

  • passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL13: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 2500 of an expected 2500

  • passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 5000 of an expected 5000

  • passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02

Penalties

  • policy violationRefunded more than a charge was overcharged×0.8

    Refunded beyond the overcharge: L8.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
340
failed tool calls
9
distinct tools
13

Final answer

I audited all 19 baggage fees posted 2026-07-20 to 2026-07-26 and annotated each one. One refund I issued was wrong, and I couldn't reverse it.

Rules used:

  • The baggage rules table gives the allowances.
  • Bulletin PB-2026-13 raised the first chargeable bag from 4500 to 5000 cents from 07-23.
  • Each fee is judged on the tier and cabin the reservation had on the posting date, taken from the tier and reservation histories.

Refunded overcharges (original payment method):

EntryReservationRefundReason
L3R812512000Passenger was gold on 07-20, so 3 bags were free.
L5R81165500Overcharged by 7500, and 2000 had already been refunded as a courtesy.
L7R81184500Silver in economy gets 2 free bags.
L10R81137500Silver in basic economy gets 1 free bag, so the fee should have been 4500.
L15R81192500The fee should have been 5000 under the new bulletin rate.
L19R81145000Duplicate of L18 for the same bags.

Marked correct, no action: L2, L6, L9, L11, L12, L13, L16, L17, L18, L21.

Marked undercharged, not re-billed: L4 (R8112) and L20 (R8121).

Marked overcharged: L3, L5, L7, L10, L15 and L19, all refunded as above.

My mistake on L8 (R8120): I refunded 7500 on L8 based on the passenger's current premium economy cabin. She was in economy on 07-21 and upgraded on 07-22, so the original 12000 fee was correct. The reviewer blocked my attempt to re-charge it, because that would be a duplicate baggage fee and re-billing isn't allowed. I annotated L8 as correct and added no new fee. The 7500 refund (ledger entry L28) is still out and needs a supervisor or finance to handle it outside the audit tools.

The reviewer also stopped me from refunding L13 (R8123) for the same reason: that cabin change came the day after the fee was posted.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.