ScaffoldBench

RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2

Gated-execute on Audit a week of baggage fees

claude-sonnet-5-5__gated-execute__airline-baggage-audit__r2

Score

0.730

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$1.11
Latency
5m 42s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
363
Tool calls
308
Subagents
26
Tokens in / out
1.2M / 36k
980,778 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 5m 42s, finished, 86 tool calls, $0.204
Review 1: refund_fee: 32.2s to 41.1s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.029
Review 2: refund_fee: 41.2s to 54.0s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.033
Review 3: refund_fee: 54.0s to 1m 7s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.041
Review 4: refund_fee: 1m 7s to 1m 18s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.038
Review 5: refund_fee: 1m 18s to 1m 30s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.039
Review 6: refund_fee: 1m 30s to 1m 42s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.037
Review 7: annotate_ledger_entry: 1m 43s to 1m 53s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.030
Review 8: annotate_ledger_entry: 1m 53s to 2m 7s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.028
Review 9: annotate_ledger_entry: 2m 7s to 2m 16s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.029
Review 10: annotate_ledger_entry: 2m 16s to 2m 25s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.030
Review 11: annotate_ledger_entry: 2m 25s to 2m 37s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.030
Review 12: annotate_ledger_entry: 2m 37s to 2m 49s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.030
Review 13: annotate_ledger_entry: 2m 49s to 3m 1s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.033
Review 14: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 1s to 3m 13s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.031
Review 15: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 13s to 3m 26s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.040
Review 16: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 26s to 3m 36s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.039
Review 17: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 36s to 3m 49s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.041
Review 18: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 49s to 3m 60s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.040
Review 19: annotate_ledger_entry: 3m 60s to 4m 11s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.042
Review 20: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 11s to 4m 20s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.038
Review 21: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 20s to 4m 31s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.043
Review 22: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 31s to 4m 44s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.038
Review 23: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 44s to 4m 52s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.027
Review 24: annotate_ledger_entry: 4m 52s to 5m 3s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.033
Review 25: annotate_ledger_entry: 5m 3s to 5m 21s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.034
Review 26: annotate_ledger_entry: 5m 25s to 5m 34s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.029

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute5m 42s$0.2048786claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 1: refund_fee9.0s$0.029119claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 2: refund_fee12.8s$0.033108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 3: refund_fee13.4s$0.0411412claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 4: refund_fee10.7s$0.0381311claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 5: refund_fee12.2s$0.0391311claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 6: refund_fee11.7s$0.037108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 7: annotate_ledger_entry9.8s$0.030119claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 8: annotate_ledger_entry14.0s$0.02897claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 9: annotate_ledger_entry8.4s$0.029108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 10: annotate_ledger_entry9.6s$0.03086claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 11: annotate_ledger_entry11.8s$0.030108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 12: annotate_ledger_entry11.9s$0.03097claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 13: annotate_ledger_entry11.6s$0.033108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 14: annotate_ledger_entry12.0s$0.031108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 15: annotate_ledger_entry13.0s$0.0401210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 16: annotate_ledger_entry10.6s$0.0391210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 17: annotate_ledger_entry12.4s$0.0411210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 18: annotate_ledger_entry11.2s$0.0401210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 19: annotate_ledger_entry11.0s$0.0421210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 20: annotate_ledger_entry9.3s$0.0381210claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 21: annotate_ledger_entry11.1s$0.0431311claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 22: annotate_ledger_entry13.0s$0.038119claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 23: annotate_ledger_entry7.2s$0.02753claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 24: annotate_ledger_entry11.7s$0.033108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 25: annotate_ledger_entry17.3s$0.034108claude-sonnet-5-5
Review 26: annotate_ledger_entry8.2s$0.02975claude-sonnet-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 12000 of an expected 12000

  • passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • failL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    0.00weight 0.04

    refunded 7500 of an expected 5500

  • passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 4500 of an expected 4500

  • passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • failL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    0.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • failL8: audit outcome recorded as correct
    0.00weight 0.02
  • passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 7500 of an expected 7500

  • passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL13: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 2500 of an expected 2500

  • passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 5000 of an expected 5000

  • passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any
    1.00weight 0.04

    refunded 0 of an expected 0

  • passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct
    1.00weight 0.02

Penalties

  • policy violationRefunded more than a charge was overcharged×0.8

    Refunded beyond the overcharge: L5.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
308
failed tool calls
7
distinct tools
12

Final answer

I audited all 19 baggage fees posted 2026-07-20 to 2026-07-26 and settled 18 of them. L8 is still unannotated because the action reviewer blocked it twice.

L8 (R8120, Mona Haddad, 12000 cents). I judge this fee correct. The reservation history shows she was still in economy when the fee posted on 2026-07-21. She moved to premium economy on 2026-07-22. As an economy passenger with no tier, she had 1 free bag. With 3 bags that leaves 2 chargeable: 4500 + 7500 = 12000 cents.

The reviewer judged it using her current premium economy cabin and refused to let me annotate it "correct". It asked for a 7500-cent refund instead. The audit rules say to judge a fee by the rules and passenger status on the date it was charged, so I did not refund it. I'd leave L8 as "correct" and have someone annotate it.

I applied the bulletin PB-2026-13 rate, which raised the first chargeable bag from 4500 to 5000 cents from 2026-07-23. I also used each passenger's tier and cabin as of the posting date.

Overcharged — refunded to the original payment method and annotated "overcharged":

  • L3 (R8125): 12000 cents. He was gold on 2026-07-20, so all 3 bags were free.
  • L5 (R8116): 7500 cents.
  • L7 (R8118): 4500 cents. Silver economy has 2 free bags.
  • L10 (R8113): 7500 cents.
  • L15 (R8119): 2500 cents. The correct fee was 5000, because the new rate applied on 2026-07-24.
  • L19 (R8114): 5000 cents. It duplicated L18 for the same bags, so it is refunded in full.

Undercharged — annotated "undercharged", not re-billed:

  • L4 (R8112): charged 9000, should have been 12000.
  • L20 (R8121): charged 4500, should have been 5000.

Correct — annotated "correct": L2, L6, L9, L11, L12, L13, L16, L17, L18, L21.

  • L6: Tara Singh became gold on 2026-07-22, so she was still silver when the fee posted on 2026-07-21.
  • L9: Quinn Harper became silver on 2026-07-22, so she had no tier when the fee posted on 2026-07-21.
  • L13: Greta Lind moved to premium economy on 2026-07-23, so she was in economy when the fee posted on 2026-07-22.

L21 was a separate 7500-cent charge for one added bag, not a repeat of L12.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.