RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Gated-execute on Share two short deliveries out among backorders
claude-sonnet-5-5__gated-execute__ecommerce-backorder-allocation__r2
Score
1.000
passed
design ran as designed- Cost
- $1.44
- Latency
- 7m 38s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 407
- Tool calls
- 345
- Subagents
- 30
- Tokens in / out
- 1.1M / 52k
- 889,113 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Execute: 0.0s to 7m 38s, finished, 72 tool calls, $0.259
Review 1: allocate_stock: 23.6s to 37.0s, finished, 19 tool calls, $0.063
Review 2: allocate_stock: 37.1s to 1m 4s, finished, 35 tool calls, $0.083
Review 3: allocate_stock: 1m 4s to 1m 27s, finished, 27 tool calls, $0.068
Review 4: allocate_stock: 1m 27s to 1m 46s, finished, 15 tool calls, $0.052
Review 5: allocate_stock: 1m 46s to 2m 17s, finished, 22 tool calls, $0.083
Review 6: allocate_stock: 2m 17s to 2m 37s, finished, 18 tool calls, $0.064
Review 7: allocate_stock: 2m 56s to 3m 6s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.028
Review 8: allocate_stock: 3m 6s to 3m 18s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.038
Review 9: allocate_stock: 3m 19s to 3m 34s, finished, 13 tool calls, $0.045
Review 10: allocate_stock: 3m 36s to 3m 49s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.040
Review 11: allocate_stock: 3m 51s to 4m 5s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.038
Review 12: allocate_stock: 4m 6s to 4m 15s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.031
Review 13: set_promise_date: 4m 17s to 4m 33s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.041
Review 14: set_promise_date: 4m 33s to 4m 45s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.036
Review 15: set_promise_date: 4m 45s to 4m 59s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.037
Review 16: set_promise_date: 4m 59s to 5m 9s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.031
Review 17: notify_customer: 5m 11s to 5m 22s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.030
Review 18: notify_customer: 5m 22s to 5m 28s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.019
Review 19: notify_customer: 5m 28s to 5m 34s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.019
Review 20: notify_customer: 5m 34s to 5m 42s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.019
Review 21: notify_customer: 5m 42s to 6m 2s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.050
Review 22: notify_customer: 6m 2s to 6m 9s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.021
Review 23: notify_customer: 6m 9s to 6m 16s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.021
Review 24: notify_customer: 6m 16s to 6m 30s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.029
Review 25: notify_customer: 6m 30s to 6m 39s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.033
Review 26: notify_customer: 6m 39s to 6m 53s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.043
Review 27: notify_customer: 6m 53s to 7m 1s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.021
Review 28: notify_customer: 7m 1s to 7m 11s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.027
Review 29: notify_customer: 7m 11s to 7m 23s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.035
Review 30: notify_customer: 7m 23s to 7m 32s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.032
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 7m 38s | $0.259 | 73 | 72 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 1: allocate_stock | 13.5s | $0.063 | 21 | 19 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 2: allocate_stock | 26.8s | $0.083 | 37 | 35 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 3: allocate_stock | 22.6s | $0.068 | 29 | 27 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 4: allocate_stock | 19.0s | $0.052 | 17 | 15 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 5: allocate_stock | 31.8s | $0.083 | 24 | 22 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 6: allocate_stock | 19.9s | $0.064 | 20 | 18 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 7: allocate_stock | 10.0s | $0.028 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 8: allocate_stock | 12.4s | $0.038 | 11 | 9 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 9: allocate_stock | 14.8s | $0.045 | 15 | 13 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 10: allocate_stock | 12.9s | $0.040 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 11: allocate_stock | 13.6s | $0.038 | 11 | 9 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 12: allocate_stock | 8.7s | $0.031 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 13: set_promise_date | 15.6s | $0.041 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 14: set_promise_date | 12.6s | $0.036 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 15: set_promise_date | 13.6s | $0.037 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 16: set_promise_date | 9.8s | $0.031 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 17: notify_customer | 11.4s | $0.030 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 18: notify_customer | 6.0s | $0.019 | 4 | 2 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 19: notify_customer | 6.1s | $0.019 | 4 | 2 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 20: notify_customer | 8.3s | $0.019 | 4 | 2 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 21: notify_customer | 19.4s | $0.050 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 22: notify_customer | 6.7s | $0.021 | 4 | 2 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 23: notify_customer | 7.6s | $0.021 | 4 | 2 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 24: notify_customer | 13.4s | $0.029 | 6 | 4 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 25: notify_customer | 9.4s | $0.033 | 6 | 4 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 26: notify_customer | 14.2s | $0.043 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 27: notify_customer | 8.1s | $0.021 | 4 | 2 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 28: notify_customer | 9.2s | $0.027 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 29: notify_customer | 12.2s | $0.035 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 30: notify_customer | 9.0s | $0.032 | 6 | 4 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks ecommerce-backorder-allocation --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passO-5201 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5201: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5202 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- passO-5202: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5203 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5203: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5204 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5204: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5206 left waiting, with a promise date1.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered@2026-08-14 L2=backordered@2026-08-14 L3=pending
- passO-5206 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them1.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-14, L2@2026-08-14
- passO-5206: customer told once, with the promised date1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5207 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- passO-5207: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5208 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5208: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5209 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5209: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5210 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- passO-5210: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5211 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=shipped
- passO-5211: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5212 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5212: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5213 left waiting, with a promise date1.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered@2026-08-14
- passO-5213 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them1.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-14
- passO-5213: customer told once, with the promised date1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5214 left waiting, with a promise date1.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered@2026-08-19
- passO-5214 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them1.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-19
- passO-5214: customer told once, with the promised date1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5215 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5215: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passBoth deliveries were allocated in full1.00weight 0.03
P-DOC stock=0, P-MON stock=0
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 345
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
I allocated the new dock and monitor stock, gave every line that is still waiting a promise date, and sent each affected customer one notice. The one exception is O-5205 (C-525), which is on risk hold, so I left it alone.
Allocated
- Laptop docks (P-DOC): O-5201 (2), O-5202 L2, O-5204 (2), O-5207 L1, O-5209 (2), O-5210, O-5211 and O-5215.
- Monitors (P-MON): O-5202 L1, O-5203 (2), O-5207 L2, O-5208 (2) and O-5212.
Still waiting, with promise dates
- O-5206 (ship-complete): both lines are promised for 2026-08-14. The dock is covered by PO-95 (ETA 08-14), and the USB-C hub by PO-90 (ETA 08-06). The order gets the later date. It could not be allocated because the hub has no stock.
- O-5213 (2 docks): 2026-08-14, from PO-95.
- O-5214 (1 monitor): 2026-08-19, from PO-97.
Policy update PU-12 and one mistake of mine
- PU-12 (in force since 2026-07-01) puts orders placed 14 or more days before allocation at the head of the queue, oldest first, whatever the tier. I first ranked by tier alone. The reviewer blocked the O-5208 allocation, so I allocated O-5203 first.
- Before that I had already allocated O-5209 (a dock order) ahead of the older O-5201, and that cannot be undone. It made no difference to the outcome, because both orders ended up allocated.
PO-91 and PO-93 also arrived
- During the run, PO-91 (4 docks) and PO-93 (3 monitors) were also marked received. I counted that stock as on hand.
- Without it, O-5201 (a dock order) and O-5208 (a monitor order) would have been left waiting. That would have been the wrong call, since O-5201 is aged under PU-12 and O-5208 is gold tier.
- It also means the dock and monitor promise dates above come from the remaining in-transit POs only.
Notices
- Fourteen notices went out: 11 allocated, plus O-5206, O-5213 and O-5214 with their promise dates.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.