RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Gated-execute on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-sonnet-5-5__gated-execute__support-monday-triage__r1
Score
0.805
- Cost
- $0.992
- Latency
- 4m 52s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 295
- Tool calls
- 230
- Subagents
- 32
- Tokens in / out
- 866k / 29k
- 681,827 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 4m 52s | $0.180 | 68 | 67 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 1: merge_tickets | 8.9s | $0.039 | 8 | 6 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 2: merge_tickets | 14.0s | $0.034 | 11 | 9 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 3: close_ticket | 5.1s | $0.011 | 3 | 1 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 4: close_ticket | 4.8s | $0.012 | 3 | 1 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 5: set_severity | 7.6s | $0.020 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 6: set_severity | 5.6s | $0.016 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 7: set_severity | 7.1s | $0.020 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 8: set_severity | 6.8s | $0.021 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 9: set_severity | 8.2s | $0.023 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 10: set_severity | 5.8s | $0.017 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 11: set_severity | 5.7s | $0.017 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 12: set_severity | 6.0s | $0.018 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 13: set_severity | 5.5s | $0.017 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 14: set_severity | 6.9s | $0.019 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 15: extend_sla | 10.2s | $0.026 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 16: extend_sla | 7.8s | $0.025 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 17: extend_sla | 6.1s | $0.020 | 6 | 4 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 18: extend_sla | 6.5s | $0.020 | 5 | 3 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 19: extend_sla | 8.1s | $0.027 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 20: extend_sla | 7.2s | $0.026 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 21: extend_sla | 7.4s | $0.025 | 6 | 4 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 22: extend_sla | 7.1s | $0.027 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 23: assign_ticket | 11.3s | $0.033 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 24: assign_ticket | 9.6s | $0.036 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 25: assign_ticket | 7.2s | $0.026 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 26: assign_ticket | 6.0s | $0.025 | 7 | 5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 27: assign_ticket | 10.5s | $0.036 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 28: assign_ticket | 10.6s | $0.041 | 12 | 10 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 29: assign_ticket | 7.8s | $0.030 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 30: assign_ticket | 7.6s | $0.032 | 9 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 31: assign_ticket | 11.8s | $0.038 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Review 32: assign_ticket | 12.3s | $0.036 | 10 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- failT-2015 graded sev10.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2015 assigned to E-2010.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- failT-2016 graded sev40.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2016 assigned to E-3020.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- failT-1999 merged into T-20030.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 230
- failed tool calls
- 3
- distinct tools
- 16
Final answer
All 14 tickets from the weekend queue are triaged: 10 are now open and assigned, 2 duplicates are merged into their survivors, and 2 non-requests are closed. I didn't escalate or page anyone, and no ticket needed a major incident.
Closed as not service requests
- T-2010: external SyncFlow marketing email.
- T-2014: automatic out-of-office reply.
Merged
- T-2012 went into T-2003, the earlier report of the Payments build failures.
- T-2005 went into T-2004, the earlier report of the CRM search errors.
- Each survivor took the broadest impact (department) and a 12:10 deadline. Neither ticket in either pair had a prior deadline.
- I left Berlin VPN (T-2001) and Lisbon VPN (T-2013) separate. They are different offices, and nothing shows they are the same problem.
Severity, deadline and owner for the other tickets
| Ticket | Sev | Due (UTC) | Assignee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-2013 Lisbon VPN | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-303 |
| T-2001 Berlin VPN | sev3 | 03-23 17:00 | E-303 |
| T-2008 VPN client update | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-302 |
| T-2007 phishing report | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-601 (security-oncall) |
| T-2002 CRM filter | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-203 |
| T-2004 CRM search (merged) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2006 payslip tax code | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2011 overtime import | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2003 payments builds (merged) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-101 |
| T-2009 build logs slow | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-102 |
- Phishing: T-2007 came in on VPN, but the requester typed his password into a fake page. The handbook makes that a sev2 security incident owned by security-oncall.
- Payroll amendment: T-2006 is single-user payroll, which the matrix rates sev3. KB-55 overrides that to sev2 until 03-31, so I used sev2.
- Deadlines: Sev2 deadlines are 240 minutes from the 08:10 triage, on the clock. Sev3 and sev4 deadlines count business hours only, starting when the desk opens at 09:00. The sev3 deadline lands at 17:00 today. The sev4 deadlines skip the 25 March company holiday, so they land at 17:00 on Thursday.
- Leave cover: E-301 (network-primary) is on leave today and E-202 (business-apps) is on leave on 26 March. The backup rotations cover instead. network-secondary's on-call, E-303, took the two VPN tickets due today. business-apps-secondary's on-call, E-203, took T-2002 (due 26 March). E-302 is on call for network-primary on 26 March and took T-2008.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.