RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Orchestrator-workers on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__airline-irrops-reprotect__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.341
- Latency
- 1m 57s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 84
- Tool calls
- 80
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 216k / 18k
- 180,703 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 10.0s | $0.021 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 1m 32s | $0.284 | 81 | 80 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 14.4s | $0.036 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 80
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
All 13 reservations on the cancelled AA918 (SFO to ORD, 3 Aug 2026) were re-protected and have their vouchers and notifications. This summary relies on a single worker report. I have no tools here, so I could not check it independently.
What the worker reported
- No change fees or fare differences were charged.
- Every passenger was told their new itinerary after it was booked.
- No bulletins were in effect.
- Passengers were seated by tier (platinum, gold, silver, none), then by earliest booking date.
| Passenger (reservation) | New itinerary | Vouchers |
|---|---|---|
| Chloe Park (R6103) | UA88, 3 Aug, business, arrives 12:25 | none |
| Iris Vance (R6109) | UA88, 3 Aug, upgraded one cabin to premium economy, arrives 12:25 | none |
| Jun Takeda and Kofi Mensah (R6110, R6111, group G-7) | Together on AA204, 3 Aug, economy, arrives 15:15 | none |
| Ben Okafor (R6102) | DL512, 3 Aug, economy, arrives 18:40 | $150 compensation |
| Farid Haddad (R6106) | UA88, 3 Aug, basic economy, arrives 12:25 | none |
| Lea Sorensen (R6112) | AA204, 3 Aug, upgraded one cabin to business, arrives 15:15 | none |
| Dev Mehta (R6104) | AA210, 3 Aug (arrives 23:50), then AA1410 ORD→BOS, 4 Aug (arrives 12:25) | $300 compensation, $180 hotel |
| Mo Farah (R6113) | Same itinerary as Dev | $300 compensation, $180 hotel |
| Hugo Brandt (R6108) | AA210, 3 Aug, economy, arrives 23:50 | $300 compensation |
| Grace Liu (R6107) | AA206, 4 Aug, economy, arrives 15:15 | $240 compensation (capped at her $240 fare), $180 hotel |
| Ana Ruiz (R6101) | AA206, 4 Aug, economy, arrives 15:15 | $300 compensation, $180 hotel |
| Elena Fox (R6105) | AA204, 3 Aug, basic economy, arrives 15:15 | none |
Judgment calls the worker reported
- Iris: She is a platinum passenger travelling alone. UA88 economy was full, and UA88 gets her there much sooner than any open economy flight, so she moved up one cabin.
- Lea: She is a gold passenger travelling alone. Premium economy on AA204 was full, and AA204 beats the remaining premium seat on DL512, so she moved up one cabin to business.
- Group G-7: The two were kept together in their own cabin with no upgrade. They were seated ahead of Ben, Farid and Lea because they booked earlier (15 May).
- Dev and Mo: Their original AA1402 connection could no longer be made because UA88 had no economy seat left. They were moved to AA1410 the next morning, the only valid connection to BOS.
Open items
- The report says nothing is left open.
- AA918 still shows its original seat counts, which the worker did not change.
- The worker did not work or resolve any service-queue requests, since they were not part of this task.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.