RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.332
- Latency
- 2m 1s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 77
- Tool calls
- 73
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 208k / 17k
- 173,227 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 7.4s | $0.020 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 1m 39s | $0.277 | 74 | 73 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 14.1s | $0.035 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 73
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 10
Final answer
All 13 passengers on AA918 were re-protected, the vouchers they are owed were issued, and each passenger was notified once of their new booking. This comes from the worker's report only; I haven't verified it independently.
Process
- No change fees or fare differences were charged.
- The worker found no active bulletins, so the handbook applied as written.
- The request queue was not touched.
New bookings (all 2026-08-03 unless noted)
| Passenger | Booked on | Cabin |
|---|---|---|
| Chloe Park (R6103) | UA88, arrives 12:25 | Business |
| Iris Vance (R6109) | UA88, arrives 12:25 | Premium Economy (one-cabin upgrade) |
| Jun Takeda and Kofi Mensah (R6110, R6111, group G-7) | AA204, arrive 15:15 | Economy |
| Ben Okafor (R6102) | DL512, arrives 18:40 | Economy |
| Farid Haddad (R6106) | UA88, arrives 12:25 | Basic Economy |
| Lea Sorensen (R6112) | AA204, arrives 15:15 | Business (one-cabin upgrade) |
| Dev Mehta (R6104) | AA210, arrives 23:50, then AA1410 ORD to BOS on Aug 4, arrives 12:25 | Economy |
| Mo Farah (R6113) | AA210, arrives 23:50, then AA1410 ORD to BOS on Aug 4, arrives 12:25 | Economy |
| Hugo Brandt (R6108) | AA210, arrives 23:50 | Economy |
| Grace Liu (R6107) | AA206 on Aug 4, arrives 15:15 | Economy |
| Ana Ruiz (R6101) | AA206 on Aug 4, arrives 15:15 | Economy |
| Elena Fox (R6105) | AA204, arrives 15:15 | Basic Economy |
- Upgrades: Iris and Lea were each a gold or platinum passenger travelling alone. Their own cabin was full on a flight that gets them there sooner than any open option in their own cabin.
- Group G-7: Jun and Kofi were kept together in their own cabin with no upgrade. They were ranked at the higher tier of the two.
- Dev and Mo: Their original onward ORD to BOS connection was broken, so the onward leg was rebooked. The AA210 to AA1410 connection is valid because the onward flight leaves the next morning.
Vouchers issued
- Ben: 15000-cent compensation voucher. He arrives 5 hours late, and no hotel voucher applies because he arrives the same day.
- Dev and Mo: each get a 30000-cent compensation voucher and an 18000-cent hotel voucher.
- Hugo: 30000-cent compensation voucher. No hotel voucher applies because he arrives the same day.
- Grace: 24000-cent compensation voucher, capped at her fare, plus an 18000-cent hotel voucher.
- Ana: 30000-cent compensation voucher and an 18000-cent hotel voucher.
- Chloe, Iris, Jun, Kofi, Farid, Lea and Elena: nothing owed, because each arrives less than 3 hours after the original time.
Flag for follow-up: The system date is 2026-10-06, about two months after the 2026-08-03 flight. The worker saw no rule conflict and acted as instructed. If any of these passengers had already travelled or been handled another way, check for duplicate handling.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.