RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Orchestrator-workers on Settle change requests under dated bulletins
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__airline-waiver-desk__r1
Score
0.818
wrong answer
design ran as designed- Cost
- $0.263
- Latency
- 1m 21s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 95
- Tool calls
- 91
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 195k / 13k
- 165,906 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Decompose: 0.0s to 6.9s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.012
Worker 1: all: 6.9s to 1m 10s, finished, 91 tool calls, $0.229
Synthesize: 1m 10s to 1m 21s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.023
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 6.9s | $0.012 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 1m 3s | $0.229 | 92 | 91 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 11.2s | $0.023 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks airline-waiver-desk --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR5201: DL542 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5201 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-301 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5202: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5202 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500
- passQ-302 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5203: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5203 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500; ledger got change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500
- passQ-303 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5204: UA90 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5204 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 3500; ledger got fare_difference 3500
- passQ-304 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5205: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5205 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000
- passQ-305 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5207: AA218 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5207 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-307 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5208: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5208 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got change_fee 7500
- passQ-308 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5209: AA1406 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5209 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-309 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5210: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5210 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000
- passQ-310 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- failR5211: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5211 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-311 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5212: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5212 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-312 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 91
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
I can't confirm the work is settled correctly, because the worker's date assumption is unresolved.
What the worker reported
- Nine flight-change requests were moved and resolved: Q-301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307, 308, 309 and 310.
- Each customer kept their booked cabin, and the worker checked flight status and seats first.
- Each charge was its own ledger entry (L1–L10), and each resolution note told the customer what they got and why.
- Q-306 (R5206, Boston) is a cancellation, not a flight change. The worker left it open for the team that owns it.
| Request | Change | Charged |
|---|---|---|
| Q-301 (R5201) | AA210 → DL542, 08-06 | $0, under Chicago waiver PB-2026-14 |
| Q-302 (R5202) | AA660 → AA664, 08-07 | $110 ($75 fee + $35 fare difference) |
| Q-303 (R5203) | AA662 → AA664, 08-07 | $175 ($150 fee + $25 fare difference) |
| Q-304 (R5204) | UA88 → UA90, 08-09 | $35 fare difference, fee waived |
| Q-305 (R5205) | AA214 → AA216, 08-08 | $85 ($75 fee + $10 fare difference) |
| Q-307 (R5207) | AA212 → AA218, 08-08 | $0, waived |
| Q-308 (R5208) | AA660 → AA662, 08-05 | $75 same-day fee |
| Q-309 (R5209) | Only ORD→BOS leg, AA1402 → AA1406, 08-03 | $0 |
| Q-310 (R5210) | AA210 → AA216, 08-08 | $105 ($75 fee + $30 fare difference) |
The unresolved problem: which date applies
- The worker treated today as 2026-07-28, the date the bulletin system reported. My instructions say today is 2026-10-05, and the worker went against that.
- The handbook says a bulletin in effect on the day of action overrides the fare rules, so the date matters. Whether each waiver applies, and the $150 versus $125 basic economy fee for Q-303, all depend on it.
- If the true date is 2026-10-05, several of these settlements could be wrong. I can't tell from the reports, and nothing in them shows the date question was checked further.
- I recommend someone verify the date and re-check the bulletin-dependent charges: Q-301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307, 309 and 310. Q-308's $75 same-day fee also rests on a bulletin (PB-2026-12).
Other notes
- The worker did not send separate passenger notifications. The resolution notes were the only customer message.
- I can't independently confirm any ledger entry or resolution beyond what the worker wrote.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.