RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Settle change requests under dated bulletins
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__airline-waiver-desk__r2
Score
0.818
- Cost
- $0.250
- Latency
- 1m 27s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 92
- Tool calls
- 88
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 177k / 12k
- 149,446 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 6.5s | $0.011 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 1m 9s | $0.216 | 89 | 88 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 12.0s | $0.024 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks airline-waiver-desk --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR5201: DL542 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5201 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-301 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5202: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5202 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500
- passQ-302 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5203: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5203 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500; ledger got change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500
- passQ-303 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5204: UA90 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5204 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 3500; ledger got fare_difference 3500
- passQ-304 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5205: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5205 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000
- passQ-305 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5207: AA218 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5207 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-307 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5208: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5208 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got change_fee 7500
- passQ-308 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5209: AA1406 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5209 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-309 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5210: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5210 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000
- passQ-310 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- failR5211: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5211 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-311 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5212: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5212 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-312 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 88
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
I can't confirm that this task is complete and correct. Nine requests were worked and resolved, but every fee ruling depends on a date assumption that conflicts with my environment.
The date problem
- The worker treated today as 2026-07-28, because the bulletin system said so and the requests are from "yesterday".
- My environment says today is 2026-10-06.
- Whether each waiver applied depends on which bulletins were in effect on the day of action. If 10-06 is correct, the waiver and fee rulings below may be wrong. Bookings on 8/3–8/9 flights would also be in the past, which makes me doubt either the date or the bookings.
- The worker said this itself and did not resolve it. The reports give no way for me to settle it.
What the worker reported (unverified by me, no tool access here)
| Request | Passenger | Change | Reported charge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q-301 | Ines Duarte (R5201) | AA210 → DL542, 8/6 | $0, Chicago waiver PB-2026-14 |
| Q-302 | Jonah Pike (R5202) | AA660 → AA664, 8/7 | $75 change fee and $35 fare difference; Boston waiver PB-2026-09 treated as expired |
| Q-303 | Kim Seo (R5203, basic economy) | AA662 → AA664, 8/7 | $150 change fee and $25 fare difference; fee taken from bulletin PB-2026-16 rather than the $125 in the fare rules |
| Q-304 | Lena Ortiz (R5204) | UA88 → UA90, 8/9 | $35 fare difference, change fee waived |
| Q-305 | Max Weber (R5205) | AA214 → AA216, 8/8 | $75 change fee and $10 fare difference; booked after the waiver cutoff |
| Q-307 | Oscar Lund (R5207, platinum) | AA212 → AA218, 8/8 | $0, covered by amendment PB-2026-14A |
| Q-308 | Petra Novak (R5208) | AA660 → AA662, 8/5 | $75 same-day fee |
| Q-309 | Quinn Adler (R5209) | ORD→BOS leg only, AA1402 → AA1406, 8/3 | $0 |
| Q-310 | Ravi Shah (R5210) | AA210 → AA216, 8/8 | $75 change fee and $30 fare difference; waiver already used on 7/26 |
The worker also said every move kept the original cabin, that flight status and seats were checked before booking, and that each request was resolved with a note to the customer.
Left alone
- Q-306 (R5206) is a cancellation, not a flight change, so it was left for its owning team.
What needs checking
- Confirm the correct effective date and re-verify the bulletin-dependent rulings: Q-301, Q-302, Q-303, Q-304, Q-305, Q-307, Q-309 and Q-310.
- Q-308 is the only one that doesn't turn on a waiver being in effect, but it also rests on the same bulletin system, so it needs the same date check.
- If the date was wrong, some customers may have been over- or undercharged. Those fees would need correcting through the ledger.
- The reports don't say how the Q-303 conflict between the bulletin and the fare-rules tool was settled beyond the worker's own reading.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.