RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Return an expired, partially shipped order
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__ecommerce-hard__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.121
- Latency
- 41.0s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 20
- Tool calls
- 15
- Subagents
- 2
- Tokens in / out
- 72k / 6.1k
- 54,988 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 9.7s | $0.015 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: unshipped-lines | 22.2s | $0.048 | 8 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 2: shipped-lines | 14.3s | $0.035 | 9 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 9.1s | $0.023 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks ecommerce-hard --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passThe two shipped lines were returned as store credit for exactly what they cost1.00weight 0.27
- passThe credit reached the customer balance, not just the ledger1.00weight 0.18
storeCreditCents=55300
- passThe line that never shipped was cancelled and refunded to the card1.00weight 0.27
line L3: status=cancelled refundedCents=13800 method=card
- passCancelled units were restocked and returned units were not1.00weight 0.18
P-HUB=10 P-DOC=3 P-MON=5
- passRead the return policy before issuing a refund1.00weight 0.09
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 15
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 9
Final answer
Order O-3001 is refunded in full (68,600 cents), but two warehouse points are still open. I could not confirm the L3 restock, and the L1 and L2 restocks wait on the warehouse.
Money
- L3 (2 × P-HUB USB-C Hub): This line had not shipped, so it was cancelled, not returned. 13,800 cents (2 × 6,900) went back to the original card as refund RF-3.
L1 (P-DOC Laptop Dock) and L2 (P-MON 27-inch Monitor): Both shipped on 2026-05-04 and are past the 30-day return window. Policy therefore pays them out as store credit, not card.
- RF-1 is L1 for 21,900 cents and RF-2 is L2 for 32,900 cents. Each is the full amount paid.
- The same 54,800 cents was added to C-300's store credit balance, taking it from 500 to 55,300.
- No double refund: The three refunds total 68,600 cents, which matches the order total and the "refunded 68,600 of 68,600" the order showed. The unshipped-lines worker couldn't see where the 54,800 came from, but it is the shipped-lines worker's RF-1 and RF-2.
Order record
- L1, L2 and L3 are all closed out, and the order status is "returned".
- Shipping address untouched.
- No other order, customer or product was touched.
Warehouse
- L3 restock (unverified): 2 units of P-HUB went back into stock, taking it from 8 to 10, and the movement is recorded against O-3001. The line showed plain "pending" with no backorder marker, so the worker treated its stock as set aside. The inventory log has no reservation entry for this order, so that is unconfirmed. If L3 was actually backordered, the 2 units should not have been added and P-HUB should be corrected to 8. Someone should check this.
- L1 and L2 not restocked: Returned goods go back on the shelf only when the warehouse receives them, and neither inventory record shows a receipt. Once the warehouse confirms receipt, restock 1 unit of P-DOC and 1 unit of P-MON.
Date discrepancy: The system clock read 2026-07-25 while the task date is 2026-10-06. Both are well past 30 days after 2026-05-04, so the store-credit outcome is the same either way.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.