RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Orchestrator-workers on Settle a desk of returns by what actually came back
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__ecommerce-returns-desk__r1
Score
0.854
- Cost
- $0.270
- Latency
- 1m 23s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 91
- Tool calls
- 87
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 170k / 14k
- 140,545 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 8.8s | $0.014 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 1m 4s | $0.234 | 88 | 87 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 10.6s | $0.023 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks ecommerce-returns-desk --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passRMA-801: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 card
- passRMA-801 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-802: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got 15900 card
- passRMA-802 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-803: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 27965 store_credit
- passRMA-803 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-804: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 27965 store_credit
- passRMA-804 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-805: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 5520 card; got 5520 card
- passRMA-805 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-806: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 7350 card; got 7350 card
- passRMA-806 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-807: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got no refund
- failRMA-807 left closed0.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-808: investigation opened, nothing refunded1.00weight 0.04
expected no refund; got no refund
- passRMA-808 left investigating1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-809: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 3800 card; got 3800 card
- passRMA-809 left open1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-810: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 9900 card; got 9900 card
- passRMA-810 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-811: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 4900 card; got 4900 card
- passRMA-811 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-812: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 21900 card; got 21900 card
- passRMA-812 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-813: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 card
- passRMA-813 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-814: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 31800 card; got 31800 card
- passRMA-814 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-815: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 card
- passRMA-815 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-816: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 4165 card; got no refund
- failRMA-816 left closed0.00weight 0.01
- passP-KEY returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +3 damaged +1 (expected +3 / +1)
- failP-HDP returns restocked into the right buckets0.00weight 0.02
sellable +3 damaged +0 (expected +4 / +0)
- passP-MON returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +2 damaged +0 (expected +2 / +0)
- passP-HUB returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +0 (expected +1 / +0)
- failP-MOU returns restocked into the right buckets0.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +2 (expected +2 / +2)
- passP-CAB returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +1 (expected +1 / +1)
- passP-DOC returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +0 damaged +1 (expected +0 / +1)
- passStore-credit balances moved by exactly the store-credit refunds owed1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 87
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
Per the worker's report, 12 of the 16 open RMAs are settled and closed. The other four are open or under investigation, as the rules require. I have only the report to go on and could not check any of this myself.
Settled and closed (refund and restock done)
| RMA | Refund | Restocked | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | 10,965 card | 1 P-KEY, sellable | 15% fee |
| 802 | 15,900 card | 1 P-HDP, sellable | No fee (PU-21) |
| 803 | 27,965 store credit | 1 P-MON, sellable | 41 days after shipping, so the 30-day window applied. The customer became gold only after the request. 15% fee. |
| 804 | 27,965 store credit | 1 P-MON, sellable | Standard tier, 41 days after shipping. 15% fee. |
| 805 | 5,520 card | 1 P-HUB, sellable | 20% fee (PU-15, requested 06-25) |
| 806 | 7,350 card | 2 P-MOU, damaged | Defective, no fee |
| 810 | 9,900 card | 1 P-KEY, damaged | Defective. 3,000 was already refunded, so only the remainder was paid. |
| 811 | 4,900 card | 1 P-MOU, sellable | Damaged in transit, no fee |
| 812 | 21,900 card | 1 P-DOC, damaged | Defective, no fee |
| 813 | 10,965 card | 1 P-KEY, sellable | Exactly 30 days after shipping, so inside the window. 15% fee. |
| 814 | 31,800 card | 2 P-HDP, sellable | No fee (PU-21) |
| 815 | 10,965 card | 1 P-KEY, sellable | 38 days after shipping, inside the platinum 45-day window (PU-18). 15% fee. |
For 803 and 804, the store credit was recorded against the order and added to the customer balance.
Not closed
- RMA-808: The warehouse received a P-CAB (graded wrong_item), but the return covers a P-MON. Investigation INV-1 was opened, and nothing was refunded or restocked.
- RMA-809: Two of three cables have arrived. 3,800 was refunded by card (2 × 1,900, no fee under PU-21), and one unit was restocked as sellable and one as damaged. The RMA stays open for the third unit.
- RMA-807: The warehouse has no receipt, so nothing was refunded or restocked. The customer says it was delivered on 07-23, but that doesn't count. It stays open.
- RMA-816: No receipt yet, so nothing was refunded. It stays open.
Date discrepancy: My context says today is 2026-10-05, but the worker reports that every tool showed 2026-07-25, and it used that date. If 2026-10-05 were the real date, the return-window results (801, 803, 804, 813 and 815) could differ. The worker saw no sign that the tool date was wrong, but this is unresolved.
No customer replies were sent, since these were RMAs and not inbox messages.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.