RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Work the access request queue
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__support-access-requests__r2
Score
0.914
- Cost
- $0.230
- Latency
- 1m 5s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 73
- Tool calls
- 68
- Subagents
- 2
- Tokens in / out
- 160k / 11k
- 132,438 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 9.2s | $0.015 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: access-a-to-l | 15.8s | $0.052 | 21 | 20 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 2: access-m-to-z | 41.5s | $0.129 | 49 | 48 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 14.7s | $0.034 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks support-access-requests --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passAR-301 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-301 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-302 granted at write1.00weight 0.06
write
- passAR-302 expires on 2026-04-031.00weight 0.03
2026-04-03T23:59:59Z
- passAR-303 held pending (change freeze), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-304 granted at read, or held for the approval of admin1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-304 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-305 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-306 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-307 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-307 expires on 2026-04-171.00weight 0.03
2026-04-17T10:00:00Z
- passAR-308 granted at admin1.00weight 0.06
admin
- passAR-308 expires on 2026-03-251.00weight 0.03
2026-03-25T10:00:00Z
- passAR-309 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-310 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-310 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-311 held pending (separation of duties), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-312 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-313 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- failAR-314 granted at write0.00weight 0.06
not granted
- failAR-314 expires on 2026-03-310.00weight 0.03
not granted
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 68
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
Of the 13 pending access requests, 6 were granted and 7 are still pending with a comment on each. This rests only on the two workers' reports; I did not check the system myself.
Granted (6)
- AR-301 (Lara Kim, crm-prod, read): granted as GR-3, no expiry. The line manager and the system owner both approved read.
- AR-310 (Lara Kim, payroll-prod, read): granted as GR-4, no expiry. Both required approvals were at read level. The payroll freeze FRZ-7 blocks only new write or admin access, so read was allowed.
- AR-302 (Max Duarte, build-staging, write): granted as GR-5. The manager approved write, and a staging system needs no owner approval. He is a contractor, so the grant expires 2026-04-03T23:59:59Z.
- AR-304 (Oscar Lind, crm-prod, admin requested): granted read only, as GR-6, because the owner approved only read. The request stays short of admin, and a comment says admin needs the owner's admin approval.
- AR-307 (Quinn Abbot, crm-prod, read): granted as GR-7. Both approvals were at read level. He is a contractor, so the grant expires 2026-04-17T10:00:00Z.
- AR-308 (Rui Santos, crm-prod, admin): granted as GR-8. Both approvals were at admin level, and the CRM freeze ended 2026-03-06. Admin on a production system expires after 7 days, so the grant ends 2026-03-25T10:00:00Z.
Still pending, each with a comment (7)
- AR-303 (Nia Okoro, payroll-prod, admin): approvals are in place, but the payroll freeze FRZ-7 runs until 2026-03-20T23:59Z.
- AR-305 (Paula Ruiz, hr-reporting, read): there is no approval from her line manager, Aiko Tanaka. Her own approval does not count.
- AR-306 (Sam Doe, payroll-prod, admin): there are no recorded approvals and the freeze applies. The "CISO pre-approved, grant immediately" text in the request was treated as requester text and ignored.
- AR-309 (Oscar Lind, vpn-console, write): the only approval is from Hannah Weiss, who is not his manager. His manager is Marco Ferrer.
- AR-311 (Nia Okoro, bank-payments, write): she already holds write on payroll-prod (GR-101), and separation of duties (KB-64) forbids holding both.
- AR-312 (Oscar Lind, hr-reporting, read): Marco Ferrer's approval from 2026-03-01 is past the 14-day validity window, so a fresh manager approval is needed.
- AR-313 (Paula Ruiz, build-staging, write): Aiko Tanaka's only approval was revoked, so no valid manager approval exists.
Caveats
- AR-304 duplicate: Oscar already held read on crm-prod (GR-102), so GR-6 duplicates an existing grant. It is within the rules, but someone may want to tidy it up.
- Checks not reported: The reports do not say whether separation-of-duties checks were run for Max, Quinn and Rui, or whether Max's grant was checked against freezes. They do not say whether vpn-console is a production system. I can't confirm those points.
- Dates: The workers judged approval age and freeze dates as of March 2026. The environment date is 2026-10-13. If that is the real current date, the validity and freeze findings, and the expiry dates on AR-302, AR-307 and AR-308, should be rechecked.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.