RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1

Orchestrator-workers on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports

claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__support-medium__r1

Score

1.000

passed

design ran as designed

Cost: $0.081
Latency: 35.2s; setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns: 17
Tool calls: 13
Subagents: 1
Tokens in / out: 55k / 4.1k; 44,664 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held

Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.

Phases

Spend$0.081

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

Phase	Duration	Cost	Turns	Tools	Model
Decompose	6.3s	$0.011	2	0	claude-sonnet-5-5
Worker 1: all	17.7s	$0.049	14	13	claude-sonnet-5-5
Synthesize	11.2s	$0.021	1	0	claude-sonnet-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks support-medium --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set
1.00weight 0.23
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)
passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket
1.00weight 0.23
T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052
passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor
1.00weight 0.15
T-1061 links=[T-1052]
passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope
1.00weight 0.15
severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)
passSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline
1.00weight 0.15
assignee=E-201 (expected E-201)
passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge
1.00weight 0.08

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls: 13
failed tool calls: 0
distinct tools: 9

Final answer

Three duplicate CRM reports are now merged into one ticket, T-1052. Two points below need a check from you.

Done (per the worker's report)

Merge: T-1052, T-1053 and T-1054 all reported the same account-search HTTP 500 outage. T-1052 is the earliest-created, so it is the survivor, and T-1053 and T-1054 are merged into it.
Deadline: T-1052 now carries 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z, the earliest deadline in the set. It came from T-1053 and replaces T-1052's original 15:05.
Severity: Raised from sev3 to sev2, the matrix grade for department-wide scope on CRM.
Assignment: E-201 Ines Kovac, the business-apps engineer on call at 12:40 when the deadline falls. T-1052 was previously unassigned. E-202, who held T-1053, was not on call at that time and was not used.
References: T-1054's link to T-1061 moved to T-1052. The worker did not report whether T-1053 had any references to move.
Left alone: T-1055 (CSV export gives an empty file for a single user) is a different problem. T-1061, the engineering ticket for the index rebuild, was not touched.
Comment: The worker posted a comment on T-1052 recording these steps.

Needs your attention

Deadline: The merge moved T-1052's deadline earlier, from 15:05 to 12:40. Policy says a deadline committed to a requester is never moved earlier, while the merge rule says the survivor takes the earliest deadline in the set. The worker resolved this by saying 15:05 was only an internal response target, not a commitment to the requester. The report gives no evidence for that, so please confirm it.
Escalation: Not done. The matrix routes sev2 escalations to platform-primary, and within it to the engineer on call at 12:40. The task asked only for grading and assignment, so the worker did not pick that engineer. If you want T-1052 escalated, that step is still open.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set: scaffold-or-scale-v1
models: Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort: high
repeats: 2
fixtures: replay
runs: 900 / 900
strategy cost: $354.44
judge cost: $9.19
wall clock: 9h 48m
git: fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.