RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Orchestrator-workers on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__support-monday-triage__r1
Score
0.805
- Cost
- $0.247
- Latency
- 1m 25s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 71
- Tool calls
- 67
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 163k / 12k
- 133,600 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 7.0s | $0.017 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 1m 5s | $0.196 | 68 | 67 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 13.6s | $0.035 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- failT-2015 graded sev10.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2015 assigned to E-2010.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- failT-2016 graded sev40.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2016 assigned to E-3020.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- failT-1999 merged into T-20030.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 67
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 15
Final answer
All 14 tickets from the weekend's new queue were triaged under the handbook, and the new queue is empty. I am relying on the worker's report alone and have not checked the ticket system myself.
Closed as non-requests (2)
- T-2010: marketing email from SyncFlow.
- T-2014: automatic out-of-office reply.
Merged as the same underlying problem (2)
- T-2005 into T-2004: both are the CRM search failure. T-2004 is the earlier report.
- T-2012 into T-2003: both are Payments builds failing since Saturday night. T-2003 is the earlier report.
- No ticket in either set had a committed deadline, so nothing earlier had to carry over. Each survivor got a new sev2 deadline.
- T-2001 (Berlin VPN) and T-2013 (Lisbon VPN) were deliberately not merged, because they are different sites and KB-11 describes a Berlin-specific cause.
Open tickets (10 survivors, triaged at 08:10Z on Monday 2026-03-23)
| Ticket | Severity | Deadline | Assignee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-2003 Payments builds | sev2 | 03-23 12:10Z | E-101 Dana Whitfield |
| T-2004 CRM search | sev2 | 03-23 12:10Z | E-201 Ines Kovac |
| T-2006 Payslip tax code | sev2 | 03-23 12:10Z | E-201 Ines Kovac |
| T-2011 Overtime import | sev2 | 03-23 12:10Z | E-201 Ines Kovac |
| T-2007 VPN phishing | sev2 | 03-23 12:10Z | E-601 Noor Haddad (security-oncall) |
| T-2013 Lisbon VPN | sev2 | 03-23 12:10Z | E-303 Sanna Virtanen |
| T-2001 Berlin VPN | sev3 | 03-23 17:00Z | E-303 Sanna Virtanen |
| T-2002 CRM saved filter | sev4 | 03-26 17:00Z | E-203 Amara Osei |
| T-2008 VPN client update | sev4 | 03-26 17:00Z | E-302 Marcus Feld |
| T-2009 Build logs slow | sev4 | 03-26 17:00Z | E-102 Ravi Menon |
Why some tickets were handled differently
- T-2006 is sev2, not the usual sev3: KB-55 amends the matrix for March payroll close (03-20 to 03-31).
- T-2007 is a security incident: the requester typed their password into a fake VPN page. It is sev2 and owned by security-oncall, even though it came in on the vpn service.
Leave cover:
- E-301 (network-primary) is on leave today, so T-2001 and T-2013 went to E-303, the network-secondary engineer on call at each deadline.
- E-202 (business-apps) is on leave on 03-26, so T-2002 went to E-203, the business-apps-secondary engineer on call at 17:00 that day.
Business-hours deadlines:
- Sev3 and sev4 clocks started at the 09:00 opening.
- The sev4 target of three working days skips the Wednesday 03-25 company holiday, so it lands on Thursday 03-26 at 17:00.
No sev1 tickets: no pages, no major incident and no escalations were made.
Still outstanding
- T-2007 follow-up: the security team still needs to reset the requester's credentials and check the account for misuse (KB-52). The report does not say this has been done.
- Deadlines due today: six sev2 tickets fall due at 12:10Z.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.