RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-sonnet-5-5__orchestrator-workers__support-monday-triage__r2
Score
0.805
- Cost
- $0.246
- Latency
- 1m 25s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 72
- Tool calls
- 68
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 172k / 12k
- 144,757 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 8.4s | $0.019 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 59.9s | $0.190 | 69 | 68 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 16.4s | $0.038 | 1 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- failT-2015 graded sev10.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2015 assigned to E-2010.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- failT-2016 graded sev40.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2016 assigned to E-3020.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- failT-1999 merged into T-20030.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 68
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 16
Final answer
All 14 tickets in the new queue were triaged, according to the worker's report. I have no tools here, so everything below comes from that report and I haven't checked it independently.
Merged duplicates
- T-2005 was merged into T-2004 (CRM search), the earliest report.
- T-2012 was merged into T-2003 (payments builds), also the earliest report.
- Neither set had a deadline before triage, so both survivors got 12:10 UTC.
- The report doesn't say whether references to the merged tickets were moved to the survivors, as the handbook requires.
Closed as not service requests
- T-2010 is SyncFlow marketing.
- T-2014 is an out-of-office auto-reply.
Triaged tickets (all ten are now open; severity from the matrix, assignee on call when the deadline falls)
| Ticket | Sev | Due (UTC) | Assignee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-2003 Payments builds | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-101 Dana Whitfield (platform-primary) |
| T-2004 CRM search | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 Ines Kovac (business-apps) |
| T-2013 Lisbon VPN | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-303 Sanna Virtanen (network-secondary) |
| T-2006 Payslip tax code | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2011 Overtime import | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2007 Phishing report | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-601 Noor Haddad (security-oncall) |
| T-2001 Berlin VPN | sev3 | 03-23 17:00 | E-303 |
| T-2002 CRM filter | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-203 Amara Osei (business-apps-secondary) |
| T-2008 VPN client update | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-302 Marcus Feld (network-primary) |
| T-2009 Build logs slow | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-102 Ravi Menon (platform-primary) |
Reasoning the worker gave
- T-2006: The matrix alone would make it sev3, but KB-55 amends it to sev2 for 03-20 to 03-31 (payroll close).
- T-2007: It is a phishing report, so it is a security incident: sev2, owned by security-oncall rather than the VPN rotation.
- Sev1/sev2 deadlines: These run on the clock, 240 minutes from 08:10, which gives 12:10.
- Sev3/sev4 deadlines: These count business hours only, starting when the desk opens at 09:00. T-2001 is due Monday 17:00. The sev4 tickets are due Thursday 03-26 at 17:00, because Wednesday 03-25 is a company holiday.
- Leave cover: E-301 (network-primary) is on leave today, so network tickets due today went to network-secondary (E-303). E-202 (business-apps) is on leave 03-26, so T-2002 went to business-apps-secondary (E-203).
Not done
- No escalations or pages were made. The worker judged that triage didn't call for them.
- No major-incident runbook was run. The worker found nothing company-wide, though it flagged the Lisbon VPN and CRM (Sales) outages as department-level issues to watch.
- The sev2 tickets due at 12:10 are the ones to watch: T-2003, T-2004, T-2013 and T-2007.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.