RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute-verify on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute-verify__airline-baggage-audit__r2
Score
0.716
- Cost
- $0.335
- Latency
- 1m 40s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 135
- Tool calls
- 130
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 258k / 15k
- 218,810 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 10.8s | $0.016 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 1s | $0.205 | 82 | 81 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Verify | 28.1s | $0.114 | 51 | 49 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 12000 of an expected 12000
- passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5500 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 0
- failL8: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- failL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 0
- failL13: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 2500 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5000 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- policy violationRefunded more than a charge was overcharged×0.8
Refunded beyond the overcharge: L8, L13.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 130
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
I audited all 19 baggage fees posted 2026-07-20 to 2026-07-26. Eight were overcharged and refunded, two were undercharged, and nine were correct. Every entry now carries its outcome annotation. I didn't re-read the ledgers afterwards. The refund and annotation tools each confirmed their changes when I made them.
The rules I applied were the baggage table plus bulletin PB-2026-13. The bulletin raised the first chargeable bag from 4500 to 5000 cents from 2026-07-23. I used the tier each passenger held on the charge date, not their current tier.
Overcharged (refunded to the original payment method via refund_fee):
| Entry | Reservation | Charged | Correct fee | Refund | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | R8125 | 12000 | 0 | 12000 | Gold on 7/20, so 3 free bags |
| L5 | R8116 | 12000 | 4500 | 5500 | Overcharge was 7500, but 2000 was already refunded as a courtesy (L24) |
| L7 | R8118 | 4500 | 0 | 4500 | Economy plus silver gives 2 free bags |
| L8 | R8120 | 12000 | 4500 | 7500 | Premium economy gives 2 free bags, so only 1 chargeable |
| L10 | R8113 | 12000 | 4500 | 7500 | Basic economy plus silver gives 1 free bag, so 1 chargeable |
| L13 | R8123 | 4500 | 0 | 4500 | Premium economy plus silver gives 3 free bags |
| L15 | R8119 | 7500 | 5000 | 2500 | Charged at 7500 instead of the 5000 first-bag rate in force on 7/24 |
| L19 | R8114 | 5000 | 0 | 5000 | Duplicate of L18 for the same bags, refunded in full |
Undercharged (annotated only, not re-billed):
- L4 (R8112): charged 9000, correct fee 12000.
- L20 (R8121): charged 4500, correct fee 5000 under the new rate on 7/25.
Correct (annotated only):
- L2, L6, L9, L11, L12, L16, L17, L18 and L21.
- L6 and L9 stand because the passengers' tier changes (to gold and silver) took effect on 7/22, after the 7/21 charges.
Other points:
- The L5 refund is 5500, not the full 7500 overcharge. That way the passenger ends up paying exactly the correct 4500 and isn't refunded twice.
- Payment status shows no payment instrument on file for the refunded reservations. The refund tool still recorded each refund to the original payment method, so I used that route. Finance may want to check those refunds actually settle.
- The baggage rules tool still shows the old 4500 first-bag price. I followed the bulletin, which overrides it.
- L22 (R8110) is a change fee, not a baggage fee. It is outside this audit and I left it alone.
- I took no action on the request queue. This audit didn't call for it, and I didn't check whether any audit request is open.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.