ScaffoldBench

RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2

Plan-execute-verify on Work a morning's customer inbox

claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute-verify__ecommerce-inbox-triage__r2

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.361
Latency
1m 52s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
131
Tool calls
123
Subagents
0
Tokens in / out
291k / 15k
243,730 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
  • Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
  • The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.

Phases

Plan: 0.0s to 11.4s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.014
Execute: 11.4s to 1m 1s, finished, 59 tool calls, $0.167
Verify: 1m 1s to 1m 11s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.032
Revise (round 1): 1m 11s to 1m 27s, finished, 15 tool calls, $0.055
Verify revision 1: 1m 27s to 1m 52s, finished, 39 tool calls, $0.092

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Plan11.4s$0.01420claude-sonnet-5-5
Execute49.4s$0.1676059claude-sonnet-5-5
Verify10.4s$0.0321210claude-sonnet-5-5
Revise (round 1)16.0s$0.0551615claude-sonnet-5-5
Verify revision 125.2s$0.0924139claude-sonnet-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks ecommerce-inbox-triage --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passO-6101 sent to the customer's corrected address
    1.00weight 0.08

    22 Leith Walk, Edinburgh EH6 5DU, UK

  • passBoth address messages answered
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passO-6102 has shipped: address left alone and the customer told why
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6103 cancelled in full
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6103 refunded to the card for what was paid
    1.00weight 0.08

    6210 card, 4410 card

  • passO-6103's goods back in stock
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passM-803 answered
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passGrace Liu's store credit left where it is, and the sender answered
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6105 cable not refunded again, and the customer told it already was
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6106 sent to the customer's office
    1.00weight 0.08

    3 Canal Street, Birmingham B1 2JP, UK

  • passThe withdrawn cancellation was not carried out, and both messages were answered
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passThe shipping question answered and nothing else done
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6112's unshipped monitor cancelled, refunded to the card and restocked; the shipped keyboard left alone
    1.00weight 0.08
  • passM-809 answered
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passUnverified sender: O-6109 left alone and the sender asked to write from the account address
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passNo refund for headphones that have not come back, and the customer told how to return them
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6101's cables cancelled, the keyboard kept
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6101's cables refunded to the card
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passO-6101's cables back in stock
    1.00weight 0.04
  • passM-813 answered
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passO-6114 cancelled, refunded to the card and restocked
    1.00weight 0.08
  • passM-814 answered
    1.00weight 0.02

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
123
failed tool calls
1
distinct tools
16

Final answer

I handled the two messages I had missed, M-813 and M-814. The inbox had 14 open messages, not 12. Both senders' emails match the addresses on their accounts, and both orders were still pending, so nothing had shipped on the lines I cancelled.

  • M-813 (Lena, O-6101):

    • I cancelled line L2, the two cables.
    • I refunded $38.00 to her card, which is what she paid for that line.
    • I restocked 2 P-CAB.
    • The keyboard (L1) stays on the order.
    • I replied to her.
  • M-814 (Omar, O-6114):

    • I cancelled the only line, L1, the dock.
    • I refunded $219.00 to his card.
    • I restocked 1 P-DOC.
    • I left O-6102 and its address alone, because it has already shipped.
    • I replied to him.

I changed nothing else.

The system date is 2026-10-12, but the order and message records all show 2026-07-25. This didn't change either outcome. There are no policy updates or other date-dependent rules involved.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.