RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__airline-baggage-audit__r2
Score
0.716
- Cost
- $0.225
- Latency
- 1m 8s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 89
- Tool calls
- 86
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 160k / 11k
- 135,975 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 12.1s | $0.016 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 56.1s | $0.209 | 87 | 86 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 12000 of an expected 12000
- passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5500 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 0
- failL8: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- failL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 0
- failL13: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 2500 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5000 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- policy violationRefunded more than a charge was overcharged×0.8
Refunded beyond the overcharge: L8, L13.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 86
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 10
Final answer
I audited all 19 baggage fees posted 2026-07-20 to 2026-07-26 (L2–L21, with no L14). I refunded 8 overcharges, left 9 entries as correct, and flagged 2 undercharges without re-billing them. Every entry now has an audit outcome recorded.
I judged each fee by its posting date. Allowance is the cabin allowance (basic 0, economy 1, premium 2) plus the tier bonus (silver +1, gold +2), using the tier the passenger held on that date. The price is 4500 for the first chargeable bag and 7500 for each further one. Bulletin PB-2026-13 raised the first-bag price to 5000 from 2026-07-23, so I used 5000 for fees posted on or after that date. Other bulletins, such as the seat-fee one, don't apply to baggage.
| Entry | Reservation | Charged | Expected | Outcome | Refund |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | R8124 | 4500 | 4500 | correct | – |
| L3 | R8125 | 12000 | 0 | overcharged | 12000 |
| L4 | R8112 | 9000 | 12000 | undercharged | – |
| L5 | R8116 | 12000 | 4500 | overcharged | 5500 |
| L6 | R8117 | 12000 | 12000 | correct | – |
| L7 | R8118 | 4500 | 0 | overcharged | 4500 |
| L8 | R8120 | 12000 | 4500 | overcharged | 7500 |
| L9 | R8126 | 12000 | 12000 | correct | – |
| L10 | R8113 | 12000 | 4500 | overcharged | 7500 |
| L11 | R8115 | 4500 | 4500 | correct | – |
| L12 | R8122 | 4500 | 4500 | correct | – |
| L13 | R8123 | 4500 | 0 | overcharged | 4500 |
| L15 | R8119 | 7500 | 5000 | overcharged | 2500 |
| L16 | R8110 | 5000 | 5000 | correct | – |
| L17 | R8111 | 12500 | 12500 | correct | – |
| L18 | R8114 | 5000 | 5000 | correct | – |
| L19 | R8114 | 5000 | 0 (duplicate of L18) | overcharged | 5000 |
| L20 | R8121 | 4500 | 5000 | undercharged | – |
| L21 | R8122 | 7500 | 7500 | correct | – |
Points worth knowing:
- Tier changes: On the fee date, R8125's passenger was still gold (dropped to none on 07-21), R8117's was silver (became gold on 07-22) and R8126's had no tier (became silver on 07-22). That is why L3 was overcharged while L6 and L9 are correct.
- R8116 (L5): The overcharge was 7500, but a 2000 courtesy refund (L24) had already been paid on 2026-07-27. I refunded only the remaining 5500 so the total returned is exactly 7500.
- R8122 (L21): I treated this as a legitimate fee for a third bag, not a duplicate, since it added 1 bag taking the total from 2 to 3 (7500 as a further bag).
- R8114 (L19): This was a second fee for the same bags, so I refunded it in full and audited L18 on its own merits.
- Undercharges: L4 was short by 3000 and L20 by 500. As the rules require, I did not re-bill either.
- Payment instruments:
get_payment_statusshowed "no payment instrument on file" for every refunded reservation.refund_feestill accepted each refund to the original payment method. Finance may want to confirm these refunds actually reach the customers.
I made no changes to reservations, passengers, flights or entries outside the window, and I didn't touch any queue requests.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.