RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Add checked bags and collect the right fee
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__airline-easy__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.048
- Latency
- 24.4s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 11
- Tool calls
- 8
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 43k / 1.9k
- 35,828 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 8.2s | $0.015 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 16.2s | $0.033 | 9 | 8 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks airline-easy --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passReservation holds three checked bags and is otherwise untouched1.00weight 0.43
checked_bags=3, status=confirmed
- passExactly one baggage fee, for the bags beyond the free allowance1.00weight 0.57
expected 4500 cents for 1 chargeable bag(s), charged 4500
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 8
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 7
Final answer
I added both bags to R1042 and charged Rosa $45.00 for them.
- Bags: The reservation went from 1 checked bag to 3, which is the maximum allowed. I didn't re-read the reservation afterward. The add tool reported the change from 1 to 3.
- Free allowance: Her economy fare includes 1 free bag, and her Silver status adds 1 more. That makes 2 free bags.
- Fee: With 3 bags total, only 1 is beyond the allowance. That bag costs the first-chargeable-bag price of $45.00. I charged it as one
baggage_feeentry, and the ledger shows that as the only entry.
The booked date for flight AS420 (SFO→SEA) is 2026-08-11, which is before today's date of 2026-10-06. The system still lists the flight and the reservation as scheduled and confirmed. I made the change as requested, but you may want to check that date.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.