RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.352
- Latency
- 1m 48s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 104
- Tool calls
- 101
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 265k / 17k
- 229,570 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 12.1s | $0.025 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 36s | $0.327 | 102 | 101 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 101
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
All 13 AA918 reservations are rebooked, and every passenger has been notified once. I didn't re-read the reservations after booking. Each booking call confirmed its own change, and I checked seat counts against the allocation before booking.
No bulletins were in force and no queued request concerned AA918, so there was nothing to resolve in the queue. No change fees or fare differences were charged, because irregular-operations rebooking is free. Ledger entries were checked for the six reservations that got vouchers (all empty); I didn't check the other seven.
| Reservation | Passenger | New itinerary | Vouchers |
|---|---|---|---|
| R6103 | Chloe Park (platinum) | UA88 on 3 Aug, business, arrives 12:25 | none |
| R6109 | Iris Vance (platinum) | UA88 on 3 Aug, premium economy, arrives 12:25 | none |
| R6110 and R6111 | Jun Takeda and Kofi Mensah | AA204 on 3 Aug, economy, together, arrives 15:15 | none |
| R6102 | Ben Okafor (gold) | DL512 on 3 Aug, economy, arrives 18:40 | 15000 compensation |
| R6106 | Farid Haddad (gold) | UA88 on 3 Aug, basic economy, arrives 12:25 | none |
| R6112 | Lea Sorensen (gold) | AA204 on 3 Aug, business, arrives 15:15 | none |
| R6104 | Dev Mehta (silver) | AA210 on 3 Aug, then AA1410 ORD to BOS on 4 Aug, economy, arrives BOS 12:25 | 30000 compensation, 18000 hotel |
| R6113 | Mo Farah (silver) | AA210 on 3 Aug, then AA1410 ORD to BOS on 4 Aug, economy, arrives BOS 12:25 | 30000 compensation, 18000 hotel |
| R6108 | Hugo Brandt (silver) | AA210 on 3 Aug, economy, arrives 23:50 | 30000 compensation |
| R6107 | Grace Liu | AA206 on 4 Aug, economy, arrives 15:15 | 24000 compensation, 18000 hotel |
| R6101 | Ana Ruiz | AA206 on 4 Aug, economy, arrives 15:15 | 30000 compensation, 18000 hotel |
| R6105 | Elena Fox | AA204 on 3 Aug, basic economy, arrives 15:15 | none |
- Upgrades: The two upgrades follow the rule for gold and platinum passengers travelling alone. Iris's economy cabin was full on the fastest flight, so she took premium economy on it. Lea's premium economy was full on AA204, which beats her best premium economy option (DL512, arriving 18:40), so she took business there. Ben did not qualify, because the premium economy seat on the sooner flights was already taken.
- Broken connections: Dev's and Mo's original ORD to BOS connection (AA1402 at 15:30) could not be kept, since no economy seat reached Chicago in time. I rebooked their onward leg onto AA1410 the next morning, which is a valid connection.
- Voucher cap: Grace's compensation is 24000 rather than 30000, because the voucher can't exceed her $240 fare.
- Seating order: Seats were assigned by tier, then earliest booking date. The Takeda and Mensah group was handled at gold priority, since Kofi is gold, and was not split or upgraded.
- Not re-protected: Nobody was left without a seat.
I only searched direct SFO to ORD flights plus the ORD to BOS flights. I didn't search routes through other airports.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.