RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Redirect the order that has not shipped
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__ecommerce-easy__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.042
- Latency
- 17.4s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 10
- Tool calls
- 7
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 32k / 1.6k
- 24,138 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 7.4s | $0.014 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 10.0s | $0.028 | 8 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks ecommerce-easy --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passThe order that has not shipped carries the new address1.00weight 0.43
O-1001 address: 7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK
- passThe edit did not spill onto the order already in transit1.00weight 0.29
- passLooked up which order was still open before editing one1.00weight 0.14
- passChecked the state of the order already in transit1.00weight 0.14
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 7
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 4
Final answer
I put the new address on the order that hasn't shipped, O-1001. The order in transit, O-1002, still has its old address.
- O-1001 (pending, nothing shipped): the shipping address changed from 12 Alder Lane, Bristol BS1 4TR, UK to 7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK. I re-read the order afterwards. Its status, lines and amounts are the same as before.
- O-1002 (shipped 2026-07-07): the address is still 88 Old Mill Road, Bristol BS3 2QQ, UK. I left it alone on purpose, because the handbook says the address of a shipped order is never changed. I checked it again after the edit and nothing on it had changed.
I made no other changes: no cancellations, refunds, restocks or edits to the customer profile.
The 88 Old Mill Road address on the shipped order doesn't match the old address on O-1001, but that doesn't affect the task. Nothing in your plan conflicted with the handbook.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.