RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Cancel one line of a multi-line order
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__ecommerce-medium__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.047
- Latency
- 21.6s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 10
- Tool calls
- 7
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 38k / 2.0k
- 31,059 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 8.0s | $0.012 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 13.6s | $0.034 | 8 | 7 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks ecommerce-medium --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passThe mouse line is cancelled and refunded to the card for exactly what was paid1.00weight 0.38
line L1: status=cancelled refundedCents=7350 method=card
- passExactly the cancelled quantity went back into stock1.00weight 0.25
P-MOU stock=32
- passThe other lines of the order are still on their way1.00weight 0.25
- passRead the order before changing it1.00weight 0.13
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 7
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 6
Final answer
I cancelled the wireless mouse line (L1) on order O-2003 and refunded it to Marcus's card. The rest of the order is untouched.
- Cancelled: L1 was 2 wireless mice (P-MOU) that hadn't shipped. I cancelled only that line.
- Refund: 7,350 cents (€73.50 if the order is in euros; the system doesn't show a currency) went back to the original card as refund RF-1. That is what he actually paid for the line after the MOUSE25 discount. The list price would have been 9,800 cents, so I didn't use it.
- Stock: I added 2 mice back to P-MOU, so stock went from 30 to 32. The line was pending, not backordered, so I treated it as having stock set aside. The inventory record showed no movements, so I couldn't confirm that directly.
- Rest of the order: The hub (L2) and the 3 cables (L3) are still pending with nothing refunded. The shipping address is unchanged.
- Not done: I didn't use store credit, and I didn't touch any other order, customer or product.
I re-fetched the order afterwards and it shows all of this.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.