RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Settle a desk of returns by what actually came back
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__ecommerce-returns-desk__r2
Score
0.854
- Cost
- $0.288
- Latency
- 1m 24s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 104
- Tool calls
- 101
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 199k / 14k
- 167,313 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 11.5s | $0.023 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 12s | $0.266 | 102 | 101 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks ecommerce-returns-desk --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passRMA-801: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 card
- passRMA-801 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-802: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got 15900 card
- passRMA-802 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-803: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 27965 store_credit
- passRMA-803 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-804: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 27965 store_credit
- passRMA-804 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-805: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 5520 card; got 5520 card
- passRMA-805 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-806: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 7350 card; got 7350 card
- passRMA-806 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-807: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got no refund
- failRMA-807 left closed0.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-808: investigation opened, nothing refunded1.00weight 0.04
expected no refund; got no refund
- passRMA-808 left investigating1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-809: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 3800 card; got 3800 card
- passRMA-809 left open1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-810: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 9900 card; got 9900 card
- passRMA-810 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-811: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 4900 card; got 4900 card
- passRMA-811 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-812: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 21900 card; got 21900 card
- passRMA-812 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-813: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 card
- passRMA-813 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-814: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 31800 card; got 31800 card
- passRMA-814 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-815: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 card
- passRMA-815 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-816: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 4165 card; got no refund
- failRMA-816 left closed0.00weight 0.01
- passP-KEY returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +3 damaged +1 (expected +3 / +1)
- failP-HDP returns restocked into the right buckets0.00weight 0.02
sellable +3 damaged +0 (expected +4 / +0)
- passP-MON returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +2 damaged +0 (expected +2 / +0)
- passP-HUB returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +0 (expected +1 / +0)
- failP-MOU returns restocked into the right buckets0.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +2 (expected +2 / +2)
- passP-CAB returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +1 (expected +1 / +1)
- passP-DOC returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +0 damaged +1 (expected +0 / +1)
- passStore-credit balances moved by exactly the store-credit refunds owed1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 101
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 14
Final answer
I settled 12 of the 16 open RMAs and closed them. Three stay open and one is under investigation. There were no inbox messages, so I sent no replies.
Closed (refunded and restocked)
| RMA | Refund | Method | Stock |
|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | 10,965 | card | 1 P-KEY sellable |
| 802 | 15,900 | card | 1 P-HDP sellable |
| 803 | 27,965 | store credit, added to C-803's balance | 1 P-MON sellable |
| 804 | 27,965 | store credit, added to C-804's balance | 1 P-MON sellable |
| 805 | 5,520 | card | 1 P-HUB sellable |
| 806 | 7,350 | card | 2 P-MOU damaged |
| 810 | 9,900 | card | 1 P-KEY damaged |
| 811 | 4,900 | card | 1 P-MOU sellable |
| 812 | 21,900 | card | 1 P-DOC damaged |
| 813 | 10,965 | card | 1 P-KEY sellable |
| 814 | 31,800 | card | 2 P-HDP sellable |
| 815 | 10,965 | card | 1 P-KEY sellable |
All amounts are in cents.
- Fees: 15% on changed-mind returns (801, 803, 804, 813, 815). PU-15's 20% applied to 805, requested 25 June. PU-21 waived the fee on 802 and 814, requested 14 and 17 July. Defective and damaged returns carried no fee.
- 803 and 804: These shipped 41 days before the request, and neither customer held gold or platinum status on the request date, so they were paid as store credit.
- 815: The platinum customer got the 45-day window under PU-18, so the refund went to the card.
- 810: I refunded 12,900 paid less the 3,000 already refunded, so nothing was paid twice.
- 806: The line paid 7,350 after a discount code, so that is what I refunded.
Still open
- RMA-809: Only 2 of 3 units have arrived, so I settled those two. The refund was 3,800 to card with no fee under PU-21. I restocked 1 P-CAB as sellable and 1 as damaged.
- RMA-807 and RMA-816: The warehouse has received nothing, so I refunded and restocked nothing. The customer on 807 says the parcel reached our warehouse on 23 July, but no receipt is recorded.
- RMA-808: The warehouse received a P-CAB instead of the P-MON this return covers. I refunded and restocked nothing and opened investigation INV-1.
The plan assumed the return window was measured from the order date. I followed the policy instead, which measures it from the date the line shipped.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.