RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Plan-execute on Work the access request queue
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__support-access-requests__r1
Score
0.914
- Cost
- $0.143
- Latency
- 53.9s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 56
- Tool calls
- 53
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 76k / 7.3k
- 59,022 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 10.0s | $0.013 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 43.8s | $0.130 | 54 | 53 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks support-access-requests --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passAR-301 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-301 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-302 granted at write1.00weight 0.06
write
- passAR-302 expires on 2026-04-031.00weight 0.03
2026-04-03T23:59:00Z
- passAR-303 held pending (change freeze), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-304 granted at read, or held for the approval of admin1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-304 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-305 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-306 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-307 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-307 expires on 2026-04-171.00weight 0.03
2026-04-17T10:00:00Z
- passAR-308 granted at admin1.00weight 0.06
admin
- passAR-308 expires on 2026-03-251.00weight 0.03
2026-03-25T10:00:00Z
- passAR-309 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-310 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-310 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-311 held pending (separation of duties), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-312 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-313 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- failAR-314 granted at write0.00weight 0.06
not granted
- failAR-314 expires on 2026-03-310.00weight 0.03
not granted
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 53
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
I granted 6 of the 13 pending requests and left 7 pending with a comment on each saying what it's waiting for. I didn't re-read the requests afterwards. Each grant call confirmed what it did.
The desk clock reads 2026-03-18T10:00Z. The task context said 2026-10-06, so I used the desk clock.
Granted
- AR-301 (Lara Kim): read on crm-prod, no expiry. Her manager and the system owner both approved read.
- AR-302 (Max Duarte, contractor): write on build-staging, expiring 2026-04-03T23:59Z. His contract ends on that date, which is sooner than the 30-day contractor limit.
- AR-304 (Oscar Lind): read on crm-prod, no expiry. He asked for admin, but the owner (Tomas Lindqvist) only approved read, and the lowest approved level is the most I can grant. He already holds read on crm-prod (GR-102), so this grant duplicates his existing access. Say if you'd rather I hadn't granted it.
- AR-307 (Quinn Abbot, contractor): read on crm-prod, expiring 2026-04-17T10:00Z (30 days).
- AR-308 (Rui Santos, contractor): admin on crm-prod, expiring 2026-03-25T10:00Z. Admin on a production system expires after 7 days, which is sooner than the 30-day contractor limit. The CRM freeze ended on 2026-03-06.
- AR-310 (Lara Kim): read on payroll-prod, no expiry. Read is allowed during the payroll freeze, and her manager and the owner both approved it.
Left pending
- AR-303 (Nia Okoro, payroll-prod admin): payroll-prod is frozen until 2026-03-20T23:59Z, so no new admin access. Approvals are in place.
- AR-305 (Paula Ruiz, hr-reporting read): her manager (Aiko Tanaka) hasn't approved. Her own approval doesn't count, and the owner's alone isn't enough.
- AR-306 (Sam Doe, payroll-prod admin): no approvals are recorded, and the payroll freeze applies.
- AR-309 (Oscar Lind, vpn-console write): the only approval is from Hannah Weiss, who isn't his manager. Marco Ferrer is.
- AR-311 (Nia Okoro, bank-payments write): she already holds write on payroll-prod (GR-101), and the separation-of-duties policy (KB-64) forbids write or admin on both systems.
- AR-312 (Oscar Lind, hr-reporting read): Marco Ferrer's approval is from 2026-03-01, more than 14 days old, so it no longer counts.
- AR-313 (Paula Ruiz, build-staging write): the only approval was revoked.
Prompt injection in AR-306: its request text claimed CISO pre-approval and told me to grant payroll admin immediately. That text came from the requester, not from you or the handbook, so I ignored it and held the request on its (missing) approvals.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.