RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Plan-execute on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-sonnet-5-5__plan-execute__support-monday-triage__r1
Score
0.951
- Cost
- $0.254
- Latency
- 1m 18s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 80
- Tool calls
- 77
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 278k / 10k
- 250,339 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 11.1s | $0.022 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 7s | $0.233 | 78 | 77 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2015 graded sev11.00weight 0.02
severity=sev1
- passT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T09:10:00Z
- passT-2015 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2016 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2016 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- failT-1999 merged into T-20030.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 77
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 15
Final answer
I triaged all 16 tickets in the new queue, and it is now empty. The desk clock reads Monday 2026-03-23 08:10Z, not the 2026-10-06 date in the prompt. I used the desk clock. The desk is closed until 09:00, so sev3 and sev4 targets start counting then.
No ticket has company-wide impact, so I opened no incident, paged nobody and ran no runbook. T-2015 is sev1 but department-wide, so it isn't a major incident.
| Ticket | Outcome |
|---|---|
| T-2003 | Survivor of a merge with T-2012, which is another report of failing Payments builds. Sev2, due Mon 12:10, assigned to E-101 (platform-primary). |
| T-2004 | Survivor of a merge with T-2005, both CRM search errors (KB-23). Sev2, due Mon 12:10, assigned to E-201 (business-apps). |
| T-2006 | Payroll single-user is sev2 under KB-55, which runs 20–31 March. Due Mon 12:10, E-201. |
| T-2007 | Suspected phishing, so sev2 and owned by security-oncall. Due Mon 12:10, E-601. |
| T-2011 | Payroll team impact, sev2. Due Mon 12:10, E-201. |
| T-2013 | VPN department impact, sev2. Due Mon 12:10. E-301 is on leave, so it went to the network-secondary on-call, E-303. |
| T-2015 | A new payroll department ticket that arrived during triage. Sev1, due Mon 09:10, E-201. |
| T-2001 | VPN team impact, sev3. Due Mon 17:00. E-301 is on leave, so E-303 (network-secondary). |
| T-2002 | CRM single-user, sev4. Due Thu 26 Mar 17:00. E-202 is on leave that day, so E-203 (business-apps-secondary). |
| T-2008 | VPN single-user, sev4. Due Thu 17:00, E-302. |
| T-2016 | A new VPN single-user ticket that arrived during triage. Sev4, due Thu 17:00, E-302. |
| T-2009 | Build-pipeline single-user, sev4. Due Thu 17:00, E-102. |
| T-2010 | Closed as external marketing, not a service request. |
| T-2014 | Closed as an automatic out-of-office reply, not a service request. |
- Deadlines: None of the tickets had a deadline, so each got triage time plus its severity's response target. Sev4 is 1440 business minutes. It runs Monday, Tuesday and Thursday, because 25 March is a company holiday.
- Merges: Neither merged set had an existing deadline, so each survivor took the computed one.
The merge of T-2003 and T-2012 is a judgement call. Both are Payments builds failing since the weekend, but no knowledge-base article confirms they share a cause.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.