RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Propose-select on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-sonnet-5-5__propose-select__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.931
- Latency
- 2m 56s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 238
- Tool calls
- 232
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 477k / 48k
- 371,214 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 1m 13s | $0.211 | 53 | 52 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 1m 5s | $0.171 | 49 | 48 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 1m 11s | $0.181 | 49 | 48 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Select | 26.1s | $0.080 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 17s | $0.288 | 85 | 84 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 232
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 14
Final answer
All 13 AA918 reservations are rebooked, the vouchers are issued, and each passenger got one message after their booking. No fees were charged and no refunds were made. I re-checked the plan against the system before acting: AA918 was cancelled, there were no bulletins or open requests, tiers were unchanged and seat counts matched. Today is 2026-10-06 but the flight date was 2026-08-03. The reservations were still confirmed on AA918 with no re-protection history, so I treated the work as outstanding.
| Reservation | New itinerary | Vouchers |
|---|---|---|
| R6103 Chloe | UA88 business | none |
| R6109 Iris | UA88, moved up one cabin to premium economy | none |
| R6110 Jun and R6111 Kofi (group G-7) | AA204 economy, booked together | none |
| R6102 Ben | DL512 economy | 15000 compensation |
| R6106 Farid | UA88 basic economy | none |
| R6112 Lea | AA204, moved up one cabin to business | none |
| R6104 Dev | AA210 economy, then AA1410 ORD→BOS on 08-04 | 30000 compensation, 18000 hotel |
| R6113 Mo | AA210 economy, then AA1410 ORD→BOS on 08-04 | 30000 compensation, 18000 hotel |
| R6108 Hugo | AA210 economy | 30000 compensation |
| R6107 Grace | AA206 on 08-04, economy | 24000 compensation (capped at her fare), 18000 hotel |
| R6101 Ana | AA206 on 08-04, economy | 30000 compensation, 18000 hotel |
| R6105 Elena | AA204 basic economy | none |
- Order and groups: I booked in priority order (tier, then booking date). G-7 was handled at Kofi's gold priority and kept together in economy.
- Upgrades: Iris and Lea were the only upgrades. Each is a gold or platinum passenger travelling alone whose own cabin was full on a flight that gets them to Chicago sooner than any open seat in their own cabin. Each moved up one cabin only, and their messages explain why.
- Dev and Mo: AA1402 no longer connects after their new SFO flights, so I rebooked their onward leg onto AA1410 the next morning.
- Hotel vouchers: Only Dev, Mo, Grace and Ana reach their destination on a later date. Hugo arrives late on the original date, so he gets no hotel voucher.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.