RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1
Propose-select on Settle change requests under dated bulletins
claude-sonnet-5-5__propose-select__airline-waiver-desk__r1
Score
0.818
- Cost
- $0.770
- Latency
- 2m 10s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 295
- Tool calls
- 289
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 514k / 36k
- 422,011 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 53.0s | $0.155 | 64 | 63 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 51.9s | $0.167 | 68 | 67 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 48.5s | $0.147 | 67 | 66 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Select | 14.3s | $0.050 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 3s | $0.251 | 94 | 93 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks airline-waiver-desk --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR5201: DL542 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5201 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-301 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5202: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5202 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500
- passQ-302 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5203: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5203 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500; ledger got change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500
- passQ-303 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5204: UA90 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5204 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 3500; ledger got fare_difference 3500
- passQ-304 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5205: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5205 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000
- passQ-305 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5207: AA218 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5207 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-307 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5208: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5208 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got change_fee 7500
- passQ-308 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5209: AA1406 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5209 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-309 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5210: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5210 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000
- passQ-310 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- failR5211: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5211 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-311 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5212: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5212 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-312 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 289
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 16
Final answer
I booked and settled all nine flight-change requests (Q-301 to Q-305 and Q-307 to Q-310) and resolved each one with a note to the customer. Every change kept the cabin the customer booked.
Date conflict. The session header says 2026-10-05, but the bulletin and refund-policy tools both report today as 2026-07-28. The requests are dated 2026-07-27, which matches "yesterday", so I acted as of 2026-07-28. The tool date is also the one the bulletins' effective dates run against. If the real date were 10-05, the Chicago waivers would have expired and several outcomes would change, so please confirm the date.
| Request | Move | Charged |
|---|---|---|
| Q-301 Ines (R5201) | AA210 → DL542, 08-06 | $0. The Chicago waiver (PB-2026-14) covers the fee and the $50 fare difference. |
| Q-302 Jonah (R5202) | AA660 → AA664, 08-07 | $110: $75 change fee and $35 fare difference. The waiver he saw is for Chicago, not this Boston trip. |
| Q-303 Kim (R5203, basic economy, silver) | AA662 → AA664, 08-07 | $175: $150 change fee and $25 fare difference. Boston waiver PB-2026-09 expired 07-15, and PB-2026-16 sets the basic economy fee at $150. |
| Q-304 Lena (R5204, basic economy, gold) | UA88 → UA90, 08-09 | $35 fare difference only. The fee is waived, but the Chicago waiver still collects fare differences on basic economy. |
| Q-305 Max (R5205) | AA214 → AA216, 08-08 | $85: $75 change fee and $10 fare difference. He booked on 07-26, after the 07-24 ticketing cutoff. |
| Q-307 Oscar (R5207, platinum) | AA212 → AA218, 08-08 | $0. The platinum extension (PB-2026-14A) covers his 08-05 flight. |
| Q-308 Petra (R5208) | AA660 → AA662, 08-05 | $75 flat same-day change fee (PB-2026-12), no fare difference. |
| Q-309 Quinn (R5209) | Only the ORD→BOS leg, AA1402 → AA1406 on 08-03 | $0. The Chicago waiver (PB-2026-14) is cheaper than the same-day bulletin (PB-2026-12), and bulletins aren't combined. UA88 is unchanged and arrives 12:25, so the connection is valid. |
| Q-310 Ravi (R5210) | AA210 → AA216, 08-08 | $105: $75 change fee and $30 fare difference. He already used the waiver's one-time move on 07-26. |
Each fee went in as its own ledger entry (L1 to L10). The six customers whose result differs from what they expected were told why in their resolution notes.
Left alone. Q-306 is a cancellation (R5206), not a flight change, so I left it for its owning team. I did not touch any other booking.
Not sent. I did not send separate passenger notifications. The resolution notes carry the new itinerary and charges.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.