RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Propose-select on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-sonnet-5-5__propose-select__support-monday-triage__r2
Score
0.805
- Cost
- $0.664
- Latency
- 1m 51s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 184
- Tool calls
- 178
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 342k / 28k
- 250,116 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 41.0s | $0.139 | 37 | 36 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 39.9s | $0.134 | 35 | 34 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 42.0s | $0.137 | 35 | 34 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Select | 19.6s | $0.064 | 2 | 0 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| Execute | 48.9s | $0.189 | 75 | 74 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- failT-2015 graded sev10.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2015 assigned to E-2010.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- failT-2016 graded sev40.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2016 assigned to E-3020.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- failT-1999 merged into T-20030.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 178
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 18
Final answer
All 14 tickets in the new queue are triaged. I re-read the clock (Mon 03-23 08:10Z), the matrix, the calendar, leave, freezes and the on-call rotas first. Everything matched the plan.
Closed as non-requests
- T-2010 is SyncFlow marketing.
- T-2014 is an out-of-office auto-reply.
Merged
- T-2012 went into T-2003. Both are the Payments build failure, and T-2003 is the earlier report.
- T-2005 went into T-2004. Both are the CRM search incident (KB-23), and T-2004 is the earlier report.
- Neither set had a committed deadline, so each survivor carries the triage deadline.
- There were no links or references to move. I commented on both merged tickets to name their survivor.
Severity, deadline and assignee
| Ticket | Sev | Deadline (Z) | Assignee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-2003 (builds) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-101 Dana Whitfield |
| T-2004 (CRM search) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 Ines Kovac |
| T-2006 (payroll, single-user) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 Ines Kovac |
| T-2011 (payroll, team) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-201 Ines Kovac |
| T-2013 (VPN, Lisbon) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-303 Sanna Virtanen |
| T-2007 (phishing) | sev2 | 03-23 12:10 | E-601 Noor Haddad |
| T-2001 (VPN, Berlin) | sev3 | 03-23 17:00 | E-303 Sanna Virtanen |
| T-2002 (CRM filter) | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-203 Amara Osei |
| T-2008 (VPN client) | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-302 Marcus Feld |
| T-2009 (build logs) | sev4 | 03-26 17:00 | E-102 Ravi Menon |
- T-2006: the matrix says sev3, but the KB-55 amendment (03-20 to 03-31) makes single-user payroll tickets sev2.
- T-2007: it is a security report, so it is sev2 and owned by security-oncall. I commented with the KB-52 guidance that security resets the credentials.
- Leave cover: E-301 is on leave today, so network-secondary covers the VPN tickets (E-303). E-202 is on leave on 03-26, so business-apps-secondary covers T-2002 (E-203).
- Deadlines: sev2 deadlines run on the clock. Sev3 and sev4 count business hours from the 09:00 opening, and the sev4 deadline skips the Wed 03-25 holiday.
I sent no pages and made no escalations. The sev2 escalation rotation is platform-primary, which doesn't own the VPN, CRM or payroll services, and a page can't be recalled. I did not merge T-2001 with T-2013, or T-2006 with T-2011, because they are different problems. No incident was opened because nothing is company-wide.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.