ScaffoldBench

RunSonnet 5.5repeat 1

Single on Return an expired, partially shipped order

claude-sonnet-5-5__single__ecommerce-hard__r1

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.040
Latency
17.2s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
11
Tool calls
10
Subagents
0
Tokens in / out
32k / 1.9k
27,084 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldsingle.toolsThe agent was shown exactly the task’s tools, none missing and none extra.

Phases

Main: 0.0s to 17.2s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.040

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Main17.2s$0.0401110claude-sonnet-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies single --tasks ecommerce-hard --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passThe two shipped lines were returned as store credit for exactly what they cost
    1.00weight 0.27
  • passThe credit reached the customer balance, not just the ledger
    1.00weight 0.18

    storeCreditCents=55300

  • passThe line that never shipped was cancelled and refunded to the card
    1.00weight 0.27

    line L3: status=cancelled refundedCents=13800 method=card

  • passCancelled units were restocked and returned units were not
    1.00weight 0.18

    P-HUB=10 P-DOC=3 P-MON=5

  • passRead the return policy before issuing a refund
    1.00weight 0.09

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
10
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
9

Final answer

Order O-3001 is fully refunded: 54,800 cents as store credit and 13,800 cents back to the card.

  • L3 (2 × USB-C Hub, never shipped): I cancelled it and refunded the 13,800 cents to the original card. I put the 2 units back into stock (P-HUB went from 8 to 10). The line showed as pending, not backordered, so I treated the stock as set aside for it. If it was actually backordered, that restock should be reversed.
  • L1 (P-DOC) and L2 (P-MON), both shipped 2026-05-04: The return window is 30 days from the ship date, and it closed long ago. Policy says these must be paid as store credit, not to the card. I recorded the refund against the order (RF-1, 54,800 cents) and added the same amount to Priya's balance. Her balance went from 500 to 55,300 cents.
  • Warehouse: I did not restock P-DOC or P-MON. Returned goods only go back on the shelf once the warehouse receives them, so that restock is still to do when they arrive.

The order now shows as returned, with 68,600 of 68,600 cents refunded.

Priya asked for her money back, and the shipped items can't go back to her card under the policy. She should be told that part comes as store credit.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.