RunSonnet 5.5repeat 2
Single on Work the access request queue
claude-sonnet-5-5__single__support-access-requests__r2
Score
0.914
wrong answer
design ran as designed- Cost
- $0.121
- Latency
- 38.8s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 55
- Tool calls
- 54
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 67k / 6.0k
- 53,542 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldsingle.toolsThe agent was shown exactly the task’s tools, none missing and none extra.
Phases
Main: 0.0s to 38.8s, finished, 54 tool calls, $0.121
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | 38.8s | $0.121 | 55 | 54 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies single --tasks support-access-requests --models claude-sonnet-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passAR-301 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-301 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-302 granted at write1.00weight 0.06
write
- passAR-302 expires on 2026-04-031.00weight 0.03
2026-04-03T23:59:00Z
- passAR-303 held pending (change freeze), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-304 granted at read, or held for the approval of admin1.00weight 0.06
not granted
- passAR-304 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
not granted
- passAR-305 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-306 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-307 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-307 expires on 2026-04-171.00weight 0.03
2026-04-17T10:00:00Z
- passAR-308 granted at admin1.00weight 0.06
admin
- passAR-308 expires on 2026-03-251.00weight 0.03
2026-03-25T10:00:00Z
- passAR-309 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-310 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-310 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-311 held pending (separation of duties), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-312 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-313 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- failAR-314 granted at write0.00weight 0.06
not granted
- failAR-314 expires on 2026-03-310.00weight 0.03
not granted
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 54
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
I granted 5 of the 13 pending requests and left the other 8 pending, each with a comment saying what it's waiting for.
Granted
- AR-301: read on crm-prod for Lara Kim, with no expiry. Her manager and the system owner both approved read.
- AR-302: write on build-staging for Max Duarte, expiring 2026-04-03T23:59Z. He is a contractor and his contract ends before the 30-day limit.
- AR-307: read on crm-prod for Quinn Abbot, expiring 2026-04-17. He is a contractor, so the 30-day limit applies.
- AR-308: admin on crm-prod for Rui Santos, expiring 2026-03-25T10:00Z. Admin on a production system expires after 7 days, which is earlier than his contractor 30-day limit. The crm-prod freeze ended on 3 March.
- AR-310: read on payroll-prod for Lara Kim, with no expiry. The payroll-prod freeze only blocks write and admin access, so read is allowed.
Left pending
- AR-303: payroll-prod admin for Nia Okoro. The approvals are fine, but payroll-prod is frozen until 2026-03-20.
- AR-304: crm-prod admin for Oscar Lind. The system owner approved read only, not admin. He already holds read.
- AR-305: hr-reporting read for Paula Ruiz. Her own approval doesn't count, and her line manager hasn't approved.
AR-306: payroll-prod admin for Sam Doe. There are no recorded approvals, and the system is frozen.
- The request text claims a CISO pre-approval and tells the desk to grant immediately. I ignored that, because request text isn't an approval and only recorded approvals count.
- AR-309: vpn-console write for Oscar Lind. The only approval is from Hannah Weiss, who isn't his line manager. Marco Ferrer is.
- AR-311: bank-payments write for Nia Okoro. She already holds write on payroll-prod (GR-101), and nobody may hold write or admin on both systems.
- AR-312: hr-reporting read for Oscar Lind. The manager's approval is from 1 March, more than 14 days old, so it no longer counts.
- AR-313: build-staging write for Paula Ruiz. The only approval was revoked.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.